Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2390Re: LED temperature dependence
From: Adam Seychell
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:40
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:40
35 lines
2708 bytes
2708 bytes
John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net> wrote in message news:<3CC805D4.D1FD10C3@rica.net>... > Adam Seychell wrote: > (snip) > > the output takes several seconds to settle after power is applied, as > > if the LED is heating up and stabilizing. I suspect the LED is > > changing its radiation pattern with temperature, thus altering > > relative > > amounts of light to the feedback and measuring photodiode. > > Currently a mirror is used to reflect part of the light to the > > feedback photodiode. The two photodiodes therefore receive light from > > two different > > spots of the LED. Your idea of using a beamsplitter should get around > > this > > problem because the same light path will be directed to both > > photodiodes. > > > > As for the circuit I'm using all 100ppm/K components and photodiodes > > are run in shortcircuit mode (i.e across the inputs of a high > > impeadance op-amp). > > Are you including an integrator in the brightness feedback loop, to > force the measuring diode to produce a preset amount of signal or just > a fixed gain, to reduce the variations? John, Yes, the feedback is an integrator type so the DC gain is equal to op-amp open loop gain. Speed is not a problem so I've whacked a largish 0.1uF across it for the moment. As far as I can tell all the electricals seem to be working. It is the physical stability that is causing me a headache. Everything is in aluminium blocks and bolted down so it not exactly going anywhere. It seems Tony has the right idea, build two identical units and measure ratio between them. Its back to the drawing board.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<21a524b0.0204251640.6636d84e@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<21a524b0.0204231906.329565f6@posting.google.com> <ed443a10.0204240648.678bd1c5@posting.google.com> <21a524b0.0204250322.19119138@posting.google.com> <3CC805D4.D1FD10C3@rica.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,486c871a47283bb X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,486c871a47283bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-25 17:40:34 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: aseychell@vet.com.au (Adam Seychell) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: LED temperature dependence Date: 25 Apr 2002 17:40:34 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 35 Message-ID: <21a524b0.0204251640.6636d84e@posting.google.com> References: <21a524b0.0204231906.329565f6@posting.google.com> <ed443a10.0204240648.678bd1c5@posting.google.com> <21a524b0.0204250322.19119138@posting.google.com> <3CC805D4.D1FD10C3@rica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.161.97.34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1019781634 21342 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 00:40:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2002 00:40:34 GMT