Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2438Re: DSP for audio work
From: Al Clark
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:46
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:46
52 lines
2636 bytes
2636 bytes
john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487 @news.optusnet.com.au: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote: > > I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I > want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking at > one of the following kits: > > Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module. > or > Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite > > I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and at > least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though. > > I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language. I figure that > assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple just > to implement FIR filters and I/O functions. I was kind of scared by > roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development > system and DSP programmers guide. > > Does anyone have experience with these kits? > Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve? > Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs? > What kits are the best value for money? > > I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to > extend that. > > best regards, > Johnny > > Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels of DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the 21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your application. The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs. -- Al Clark Danville Signal Processing, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 10:46:08 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Al Clark <dsp@danvillesignal.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp Subject: Re: DSP for audio work Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:46:05 -0000 Organization: Danville Signal Processing, Inc. Message-ID: <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 52