🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2438

Re: DSP for audio work

#2438
From: Al Clark
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:46
52 lines
2636 bytes
john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487
@news.optusnet.com.au:

> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote:
> 
> I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I
> want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking at
> one of the following kits:
> 
> Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module.
> or
> Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite
> 
> I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and at
> least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though.
> 
> I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language.  I figure that
> assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple just
> to implement FIR filters and  I/O functions.  I was kind of scared by
> roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development
> system and DSP programmers guide. 
> 
> Does anyone have experience with these kits?
> Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve?
> Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs?
> What kits are the best value for money?
> 
> I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to
> extend that.
> 
> best regards,
> Johnny
> 
> 

Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels of 
DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the 
21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your application.

The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs.






-- 
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff
Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public
X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public
X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 10:46:08 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Al Clark <dsp@danvillesignal.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp
Subject: Re: DSP for audio work
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:46:05 -0000
Organization: Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
Message-ID: <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Lines: 52