Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2439Re: DSP for audio work
From: KG7HF
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:31
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:31
63 lines
3464 bytes
3464 bytes
I agree, the 21161N EZ-Kit would be a good choice since you budget is $500. The debugger with the 21161N Ez-Kit is USB based, and is much faster and more robust than that available with the 21065L EZ-Kit. I think you will also find that if you do run into any technical difficulties, you will get a much better responses using the newer evaluation boards. PD. "Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message news:Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101... > john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487 > @news.optusnet.com.au: > > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote: > > > > I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I > > want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking at > > one of the following kits: > > > > Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module. > > or > > Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite > > > > I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and at > > least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though. > > > > I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language. I figure that > > assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple just > > to implement FIR filters and I/O functions. I was kind of scared by > > roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development > > system and DSP programmers guide. > > > > Does anyone have experience with these kits? > > Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve? > > Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs? > > What kits are the best value for money? > > > > I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to > > extend that. > > > > best regards, > > Johnny > > > > > > Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels of > DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the > 21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your application. > > The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs. > > > > > > > -- > Al Clark > Danville Signal Processing, Inc. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff > Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3c9e5515@news.mdc.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.mdc.netReferences:
<3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 14:36:13 PST From: "KG7HF" <KG7HF@amsat.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101> Subject: Re: DSP for audio work Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:31:58 -0500 Lines: 65 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.sun4.dialup.g4.net Message-ID: <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net> X-Trace: news.mdc.net 1017009429 99.sun4.dialup.g4.net (24 Mar 2002 17:37:09 -0500) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.mdc.net