🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2439

Re: DSP for audio work

#2439
From: KG7HF
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:31
63 lines
3464 bytes
I agree, the 21161N EZ-Kit would be a good choice since you budget is $500.
The debugger with the 21161N Ez-Kit is USB based, and is much faster and
more robust than that available with the 21065L EZ-Kit.  I think you will
also find that if you do run into any technical difficulties, you will get a
much better responses using the newer evaluation boards.

PD.


"Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message
news:Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101...
> john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote in news:3c9db1ea.6888487
> @news.optusnet.com.au:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:18:32 GMT, john_wr100@yahoo.com (Johnny) wrote:
> >
> > I am planning on doing some experimentation with digital fitlers. I
> > want to make an active crossover for my audio system. I was looking at
> > one of the following kits:
> >
> > Motorola DSP5636X Evaluation module.
> > or
> > Analog devices ADSP-21065L Ez-Kit lite
> >
> > I probably need about 80 Million multiply/accumate per second and at
> > least 24bit fixed point. Faster is better though.
> >
> > I dont mind programming in Assembly or C language.  I figure that
> > assembly is probably fine because my code should be pretty simple just
> > to implement FIR filters and  I/O functions.  I was kind of scared by
> > roughly 1000 pages of documentation for the motorola development
> > system and DSP programmers guide.
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with these kits?
> > Which is easier to use, and will offer the best learning curve?
> > Should I look at Texas Instuments or other DSPs?
> > What kits are the best value for money?
> >
> > I was thinking of spending around US$500, but I might be able to
> > extend that.
> >
> > best regards,
> > Johnny
> >
> >
>
> Since you mentioned crossovers, I assume you need at least 4 channels of
> DACs. I would get a 21161 EZ-Kit. This 21161 is much faster than the
> 21065L. It also has SIMD hich will work very well for your application.
>
> The EZ-Kit was 8 channels of 96kHz DACs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Al Clark
> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff
> Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.mdc.net
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public
X-Google-Thread: 103407,d43e8f202cc9402f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public
X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,ad386b215662caf0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 14:36:13 PST
From: "KG7HF" <KG7HF@amsat.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics,comp.dsp
References: <3c9da171.2670537@news.optusnet.com.au> <3c9db1ea.6888487@news.optusnet.com.au> <Xns91DB81B2F6D2aclarkdanvillesignal@209.249.90.101>
Subject: Re: DSP for audio work
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:31:58 -0500
Lines: 65
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.sun4.dialup.g4.net
Message-ID: <3c9e5515@news.mdc.net>
X-Trace: news.mdc.net 1017009429 99.sun4.dialup.g4.net (24 Mar 2002 17:37:09 -0500)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.mdc.net