🚀 go-pugleaf

John Fields wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:53:05 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:08:48 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou fiend of hell. It out
>>> herods Herrod. Ye cooed:  
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:43:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou petty rebel. Thou
>>>>> evil soul. Ye harried:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:34:40 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou foolish carrion.
>>>>>>> Thou cittern-head. Ye tehee'd:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:26:10 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou fat whoremonger.
>>>>>>>>> Thou mad ditch whore. Ye spurted:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:01:24 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou idiot. Thou
>>>>>>>>>>> boil-brained, eye-offending bawd. Ye grated:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:26:35 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> Thou piggy-eyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> canker blossom. Thou underachieving polled bachelor. Ye
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blathered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 04:10:25 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou dimunitive of nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thou bug-eyed, unmuzzled confirmer of false reckonings. Ye
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wallowed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:21:28 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nntp.news@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> Thou nit. Though you bite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so sharp at reasons, you are so empty of them. Ye leaked:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:00:37 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:07:43 +1000, Lionel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@imagenoir.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:47:48 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd better behave or we will confiscate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multimeter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha! I have TWO!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One for volts and the other one for amps?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite often, actually. And nearly as often for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitoring voltages on different parts of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breadboard circuit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just one for volts should work well with just an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incandescent lamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a battery in the circuit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well then, that'll save you a little cash & bench
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space, won't it? ;^)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I worry about that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sigh> Because you were just pointing out that you were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only working with simple lamp & battery circuits, so you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only needed one meter, instead of the two that I often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require. So I politely observed that /one/ meter will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally cost you less than /two/ meters, & that /one/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meter would also likely take up less bench space than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /two/ meters, you see? I trust that was a little easier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for you to grasp the second time around.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got plenty of both, plus some test equipment and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your lamp & battery circuits? What on earth for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've already admitted that you only need one meter to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the job done. Really, rather than wasting good test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gear, etc, you should sell it or give it to someone who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually /needs/ lots of gear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How much effort do you think it will take me to convince
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him he needs at least a dual trace oscilloscope for his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamp and battery circuits? Plus a pulse generator, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frequency generator, spectrum analyser, vector signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyser, function generator, logic analyser and perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a time-domain reflectometer as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugger-all, most likely. It's amazing what lame excuses a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genuine gearhead can come up with to justify buying the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shiny new gizmo they saw on the front cover of the latest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue of "Whatsit World".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, because you disapprove<BITCHSLAP>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show me my disaproval, liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... confusion reigns.  Look at it a little more closely
>>>>>>>>>>>> and you'll see that was my reply to what immediately preceded
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, Lionel's reply to your previous post about "How much
>>>>>>>>>>>> effort..."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My reply to you was the Social Security thing.
>>>>>>>>>>> The unanswered question stands. Show me my disaproval. Quote
>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Do you still not understand?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The disapproval I was referring to was Lionel's.  Yours was
>>>>>>>>>> nonexistent so it would be impossible to quote it.
>>>>>>>>> Bad luck for you that you replied to me.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> In what way?
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, try again.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Well, let's clear the other thing up first...
>>>>>>> No. I will deal with whathever I decide will be dealt with, whoch
>>>>>>> at the moment is your fuckwittery in not being able to use your
>>>>>>> newsreader.
>>>>>> Well, OK, whathever...  Out of the godness of my heart I'll allow
>>>>>> you your whim, whoch seems to be centered about inability to use
>>>>>> newsreaders.
>>>>> You fuck up the simple task of identifying exactly who it is you are
>>>>> replying to therefore you will allow me X? And you expect people to
>>>>> believe that, yes?
>>>> ---
>>>> Well, let's see...
>>>>
>>>> I've stated several times that the reply _you_ mistakenly thought
>>>> was addressed to you was addressed to Lionel
>>> Yes, i know; that's why you're a fuckwit.
>>>
>>>> , I've explained to you
>>>> in excruciating detail how the post was structured in another vain
>>>> attempt to unmuddy the water in your stream, and yet you persist in
>>>> insisting that you still don't understand.
>>> Why in the name of Moses should I even try to understand your fuckup when 
>>> you don't understand it yourself, fucksplatter?
>>>
>>>> Methinks
>>> The evidence suggests otherwise.
>>>
>>>> perhaps the
>>>> gentleman doth protest too much... Yes?
>>> I have no dick.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>>> I think
>>>>> Don't make unsupportable claims. The evidence suggests the exact
>>>>> opposite.
>>>> ---
>>>> Ah yes, the "evidence"...
>>>>
>>>> The repeated plea of ignorance.
>>> Maybe if you actually read your posts before you sent them...
>> Yeah, like that's ever going to happen. In a years time, I'm sure he's
>> still going to be trying to explain to everyone in this group why we
>> should've found that lamp & battery 'witticism' of his hilariously
>> funny, goddamnit, & how our failure to do so couldn't possibly be
>> because he's about as amusing as a case of genital eczema.
> 
> ---
> A condition you've no doubt learned to live with over the years.
> 

Loonel also has massive amounts of fromundercheese that needs to be
scraped off with an ice pick.
>