Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2506Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
From: Henry Schmidt
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:38
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:38
182 lines
8431 bytes
8431 bytes
John Fields wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:30:48 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:44:24 -0500, John Fields >> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:15:43 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:11:08 -0500, John Fields >>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:55 -0500, John Fields >>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:10:57 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:49:05 -0500, John Fields >>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:35:53 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Yes, believe it or not. I wouldn't fall off my chair in shock if he >>>>>>>>>> were to admit to still being a virgin. >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> Five grandchildren. >>>>>>>> Never heard of adoption, step-children, artifical insemination or >>>>>>>> extra-marital affairs? >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Artificial insemination requires masturbation, which technically >>>>>>> obviates voluntary virginity. >>>>>> I doubt that yours would be voluntary. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Extra-marital sex inherently implies >>>>>>> the loss of virginity because of that loss in the original marriage. >>>>>> Marriages aren't always consummated, John. >>>>> --- >>>>> Still, the extra-marital fling does away with virginity unless the >>>>> fling is platonic. >>>> You thought I was talking about /you/ having an affair? - That >>>> figures. >>> --- >>> No, I didn't, but that figures. >> No? - Then how would your wife having an extra-marital affair remove >> /your/ virginity? >> >>>>>>> You just don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you? ;) >>>>>> ...sayd the dweeb who thinks that masturbation cures virginity. >>>>> --- >>>>> It doesn't? >>>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings, dude. >>> --- >> >From what I've seen of you so far, quite the opposite seems to be >>> true. >> True, I was being more than a little sarcastic there. >> >>> Matter of fact, had you been the Angel of the Annunciation, Mary >>> would probably have gone looking for an abortion. >> Now /that/ would be an achievement to be proud of. > > --- > So, you worship suffering and death? > --- > > >>>>>>>> I can see that you're not all that clear on the mechanics of the >>>>>>>> process. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Oh yeah, the old in-and-out... It's so hard to figure out... >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The oldest starting college next year. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you? >>>>>>>> Are you asking me about my sex life (pretty damn good lately), whether >>>>>>>> I have any kids, or whether I have any grandkids? >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Certainly not the first, since it matters little to me whether your >>>>>>> local pound has seen fit to open its doors to overnight conjugal >>>>>>> visitors. >>>>>> *snort* Like most men, I'd be lying if I claimed to have never woken >>>>>> up next to a few woofers, but most of the women I've been involved >>>>>> with have been very attractive, & quite a few have been gorgeous. >>>>>> Eg; <http://lo.ve.ly/gallery/Usenet/LK0M4204_135mm> with whom I had my >>>>>> 4th anniversary a couple of months ago. >>>>> --- >>>>> Goddam, Lionel, what's it like to go through life with only one arm? >>>> Okay, on this one, I'll cheerfully admit that I don't have the >>>> faintest idea what you're trying to say. If it was intended to be an >>>> insult of some sort, you might want to rephrase it. >>> --- >>> OK, let me try to put this as delicately as I can: >>> >>> You post a picture of your GF and I reply with: "What's it like to >>> go through life with only one arm?" Have you led such a sheltered >>> life that you can't put two and two together? >> So it would seem, because I still don't get the joke. > > --- > Oh, well... One day you will. > --- > >>>>>>> Other than that, I would be interested in knowing what overhead >>>>>>> you've foisted on the planet. >>>>>> Sure. One son, so far. And how many biological children do you have, >>>>>> Johnny? >>>>> --- >>>>> Five, and five grandchildren. >>>> Any of the paternity tests come back positive? >>> --- >>> Yes, they all had fathers. >> Well, at least that rules out parthenogenesis, eh? > > --- > Hey! You know a BIG WORD! > --- > >>>>>>>>> Like I said earlier, "When the joke's on you, it seldom seems >>>>>>>>> funny." >>>>>>>> Well, seeing as something like five different posters have posted to >>>>>>>> that part of the thread, & you're the only one who thought it was >>>>>>>> funny, I know which possibility /I'd/ bet on. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Why am I not surprised? The inability to perceive humor doesn't >>>>>>> mean that humor doesn't exist, all it means is that you're so full >>>>>>> of yourselves that you can't step outside of yourselves and laugh at >>>>>>> your own foibles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is, it's always funny when you get to laugh at someone else's >>>>>>> foolishness, but it's never funny when they get to laugh at yours, >>>>>>> eh? >>>>>> Oh, every now & then someone makes one at my expense that I can't help >>>>>> but laugh at. It doesn't seem at all likely that it's something you'll >>>>>> ever achieve, SwirlyBoi. >>>>> --- >>>>> We'll see, Nellie. :-) >>>> Go for your life, Swirly. If I get bored, I'll just stop replying to >>>> you directly. >>> --- >>> No chance of that happening, huh...? >> Given that I still flame DoucheMonkey every now & then, you'd have to >> work pretty hard at it, yes. > > --- > "Flame"??? > --- > >>> "And I went down to the demonstration >>> To get my fair share of abuse >>> Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration >>> If we don't we're gonna blow a 50-amp fuse" >>> >>> Sing it to me now... >>> >>> You can't always get what you want >>> You can't always get what you want >>> You can't always get what you want >>> But if you try sometimes well you just might find >>> You get what you need" >>> >>> "You Can't Always Get What You Want" >>> Rolling Stones >>> >>> and: >>> >>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote+ugly >>> >>> and a look into the future, at the early twenties of your firstborn: >>> >>> http://www.cybersalt.org/cleanlaugh/images/04/doghumanface.htm >> Lame. > > --- > Lame. Loonel is Lame. > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<IDNUh.8048$h8.4795@trnddc06>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mailReferences:
<evm2a4$l8n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350 X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid109d17,gid1082f5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail From: Henry Schmidt <schmitty@nottelling.nope> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,aus.photo,soc.men Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom* References: <evm2a4$l8n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 182 Message-ID: <IDNUh.8048$h8.4795@trnddc06> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:38:00 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.89.46.218 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc06 1176741480 138.89.46.218 (Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:00 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:00 EDT