🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2506

Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*

#2506
From: Henry Schmidt
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:38
182 lines
8431 bytes
John Fields wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:30:48 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:44:24 -0500, John Fields
>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:15:43 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:11:08 -0500, John Fields
>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:00:24 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:55 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:10:57 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:49:05 -0500, John Fields
>>>>>>>> <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:35:53 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, believe it or not. I wouldn't fall off my chair in shock if he
>>>>>>>>>> were to admit to still being a virgin.
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Five grandchildren.
>>>>>>>> Never heard of adoption, step-children, artifical insemination or
>>>>>>>> extra-marital affairs? 
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Artificial insemination requires masturbation, which technically
>>>>>>> obviates voluntary virginity.
>>>>>> I doubt that yours would be voluntary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Extra-marital sex inherently implies
>>>>>>> the loss of virginity because of that loss in the original marriage.
>>>>>> Marriages aren't always consummated, John.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Still, the extra-marital fling does away with virginity unless the
>>>>> fling is platonic.
>>>> You thought I was talking about /you/ having an affair? - That
>>>> figures.
>>> ---
>>> No, I didn't, but that figures.
>> No? - Then how would your wife having an extra-marital affair remove
>> /your/ virginity?
>>
>>>>>>> You just don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you? ;)
>>>>>> ...sayd the dweeb who thinks that masturbation cures virginity.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> It doesn't?
>>>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings, dude.
>>> ---
>> >From what I've seen of you so far,  quite the opposite seems to be
>>> true.
>> True, I was being more than a little sarcastic there.
>>
>>> Matter of fact, had you been the Angel of the Annunciation, Mary
>>> would probably have gone looking for an abortion. 
>> Now /that/ would be an achievement to be proud of.
> 
> ---
> So, you worship suffering and death?
> ---
> 
> 
>>>>>>>> I can see that you're not all that clear on the mechanics of the
>>>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Oh yeah, the old in-and-out... It's so hard to figure out...
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The oldest starting college next year.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you?
>>>>>>>> Are you asking me about my sex life (pretty damn good lately), whether
>>>>>>>> I have any kids, or whether I have any grandkids?
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Certainly not the first, since it matters little to me whether your
>>>>>>> local pound has seen fit to open its doors to overnight conjugal
>>>>>>> visitors.
>>>>>> *snort* Like most men, I'd be lying if I claimed to have never woken
>>>>>> up next to a few woofers, but most of the women I've been involved
>>>>>> with have been very attractive, & quite a few have been gorgeous.
>>>>>> Eg; <http://lo.ve.ly/gallery/Usenet/LK0M4204_135mm> with whom I had my
>>>>>> 4th anniversary a couple of months ago.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Goddam, Lionel, what's it like to go through life with only one arm?
>>>> Okay, on this one, I'll cheerfully admit that I don't have the
>>>> faintest idea what you're trying to say. If it was intended to be an
>>>> insult of some sort, you might want to rephrase it.
>>> ---
>>> OK, let me try to put this as delicately as I can:
>>>
>>> You post a picture of your GF and I reply with: "What's it like to
>>> go through life with only one arm?"  Have you led such a sheltered
>>> life that you can't put two and two together?
>> So it would seem, because I still don't get the joke.
> 
> ---
> Oh, well... One day you will.
> ---
> 
>>>>>>> Other than that, I would be interested in knowing what overhead
>>>>>>> you've foisted on the planet.
>>>>>> Sure. One son, so far. And how many biological children do you have,
>>>>>> Johnny?
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Five, and five grandchildren.
>>>> Any of the paternity tests come back positive?
>>> ---
>>> Yes, they all had fathers.  
>> Well, at least that rules out parthenogenesis, eh?
> 
> ---
> Hey! You know a BIG WORD!
> ---
>  
>>>>>>>>> Like I said earlier, "When the joke's on you, it seldom seems
>>>>>>>>> funny."
>>>>>>>> Well, seeing as something like five different posters have posted to
>>>>>>>> that part of the thread, & you're the only one who thought it was
>>>>>>>> funny, I know which possibility /I'd/ bet on.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Why am I not surprised?  The inability to perceive humor doesn't
>>>>>>> mean that humor doesn't exist, all it means is that you're so full
>>>>>>> of yourselves that you can't step outside of yourselves and laugh at
>>>>>>> your own foibles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is, it's always funny when you get to laugh at someone else's
>>>>>>> foolishness, but it's never funny when they get to laugh at yours,
>>>>>>> eh?
>>>>>> Oh, every now & then someone makes one at my expense that I can't help
>>>>>> but laugh at. It doesn't seem at all likely that it's something you'll
>>>>>> ever achieve, SwirlyBoi.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> We'll see, Nellie. :-)
>>>> Go for your life, Swirly. If I get bored, I'll just stop replying to
>>>> you directly.
>>> ---
>>> No chance of that happening, huh...? 
>> Given that I still flame DoucheMonkey every now & then, you'd have to
>> work pretty hard at it, yes.
> 
> ---
> "Flame"???
> ---
> 
>>> "And I went down to the demonstration
>>> To get my fair share of abuse
>>> Singing, "We're gonna vent our frustration
>>> If we don't we're gonna blow a 50-amp fuse"
>>>
>>> Sing it to me now...
>>>
>>> You can't always get what you want
>>> You can't always get what you want
>>> You can't always get what you want
>>> But if you try sometimes well you just might find
>>> You get what you need"
>>>
>>> "You Can't Always Get What You Want"
>>> Rolling Stones
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote+ugly
>>>
>>> and a look into the future, at the early twenties of your firstborn:
>>>
>>> http://www.cybersalt.org/cleanlaugh/images/04/doghumanface.htm
>> Lame.
> 
> ---
> Lame.
Loonel is Lame.
> 
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <IDNUh.8048$h8.4795@trnddc06>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
References: <evm2a4$l8n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,ff04e4273eed693a
X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,46f33c8cc047e350
X-Google-Thread: 109d17,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,250f961f377d0f03
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid10f7a7,gid111d0a,gid109d17,gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!bc0dbcdd!not-for-mail
From: Henry Schmidt <schmitty@nottelling.nope>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,aus.photo,soc.men
Subject: Re: sci.electronics.design - a Victory for Netiquette & *Freadom*
References: <evm2a4$l8n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <evm57c$t2a$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <vi9t13lqmnq2ihuu4mepsstpakp44ub2ck@4ax.com> <evmapq$doi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <q0vv13ddud9qm32cdjdn6661ui68hnebhs@4ax.com> <evs0vq$qlt$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <va84239ir4o5tulo4747kodv2abmmlg6o6@4ax.com> <evtj3i$6ea$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <e56523di8v2o0hn10gd9r517m5n4r3nni4@4ax.com> <evun5b$6sn$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <8307239usdfbao08004uemg2b02kua2ssu@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 182
Message-ID: <IDNUh.8048$h8.4795@trnddc06>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:38:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.89.46.218
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trnddc06 1176741480 138.89.46.218 (Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:00 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:38:00 EDT