Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #840Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps?
From: Tim Williams
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:43
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:43
14 lines
1808 bytes
1808 bytes
"Shaun" <not.today@go.away.au> wrote in message news:4a684505$0$2227$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > It might be possible but I can't think of any non-conductive material that > could be layered thin enough and still go through a wave solder machine. Um, so what about the stuff they put on resistors? Ink is incredibly thin stuff. Tim -- Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk. Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<r1Y9m.18834$eS5.11501@newsfe25.iad>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe25.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <ttqdnac-5O96jPXXnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@posted.localnet> <4a68395a$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <4a683e83$0$9756$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4a684505$0$2227$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: a5a6238865,26f718ada9b9cff2 X-Google-Attributes: gida5a6238865,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe25.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@charter.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics References: <Z_S9m.29971$ZN.18539@newsfe23.iad> <ttqdnac-5O96jPXXnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@posted.localnet> <4a68395a$0$3253$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <4a683e83$0$9756$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <4a684505$0$2227$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: Why don't they mark SMD caps? Lines: 16 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Message-ID: <r1Y9m.18834$eS5.11501@newsfe25.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: mddniijonlkaabonaolgpajgcgioinpb X-Complaints-To: abuse@charter.net X-Trace: cineoljmlfmnfokdkenaajobffgmphfmacplbdgcflakkjbjmddniijonlkaabondihalkgihoejnicnbdkghbllfeimjkjojieljmmmgodhklofjimlhndnchafplpobgdoooicbbgjoani NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:43:19 UTC Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:43:12 -0500