Article View: sci.electronics.repair
Article #84Re: is third transformer hole an earth?
From: ian field
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23
218 lines
10572 bytes
10572 bytes
"Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:2bc3rq.btk.19.1@news.alt.net... > On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:50:28 -0000, "Arfa Daily" > <arfa.daily@ntlworld.com>wrote: > >> >>"Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message >>news:slrnghlo20.bmt.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net... >>> On 2008-11-12, Arfa Daily <arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:slrnghjjbg.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net... >>>>> On 2008-11-11, Arfa Daily <arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote: >>>>>> "Whiskers" <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:slrnghja8j.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 2008-11-10, Dave Plowman (News) <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>> <slrnghhb1o.bes.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> A system carrying a lot of amps to the load that's drawing it, is no >>>>>> more >>>>>> or >>>>>> less dangerous than one that's only carrying a small current, except >>>>>> in >>>>>> as >>>>>> much as there is a greater potential for heat failure at connection >>>>>> points >>>>>> within that system. A high voltage system, irrespective of how many >>>>>> amps >>>>>> it >>>>>> is capable of carrying above a few milliamps, is far more dangerous >>>>>> to >>>>>> a >>>>>> human, than a low voltage system good for a few hundred amps. Given >>>>>> the >>>>>> (reasonably) constant resistance of any described path through the >>>>>> human >>>>>> body, a voltage of a hundred volts with a current availability of as >>>>>> little >>>>>> as 50mA, may be enough to kill under the right (wrong!) >>>>>> circumstances. >>>>> >>>>> So a charge of 10kV from walking across a carpet (DC) , or a >>>>> "non-lethal" >>>>> 50kV "Tazer" (AC), are more dangerous than a 1kV power line? The >>>>> danger >>>>> from 'High Voltage' power lines comes from the vast amount of current >>>>> they >>>>> can deliver. >>>> >>>> You see, there you go getting your apples and oranges mixed up again. A >>>> static charge from a carpet is not lethal to you because it is an >>>> extremely >>>> high resistance source. That is the nature of a static charge. No >>>> matter >>>> whether it is 1kV, 10kV or 40kV, the source resistance will ensure that >>>> only >>>> uA will flow for decimals of a uS. Enough to give you a nasty little >>>> crack, >>>> yes, but not enough to come within several orders of magnitude of being >>>> lethal. The same applies to the taser. It is designed to not be able to >>>> supply enough current (theoretically) to be lethal. However, its aim is >>>> to >>>> incapacitate by disrupting nerve activity and causing extreme pain. To >>>> do >>>> this, the charge is applied to the receiving body in multiple >>>> short-duration >>>> pulses. In some cases, this has proven to be fatal, I believe, due to >>>> the >>>> length of time that the pulses are delivered for. On the other hand, a >>>> high >>>> voltage power line, or even a fairly low voltage household supply, *is* >>>> potentially lethal not because it can deliver huge amounts of amps, but >>>> because the voltage that is present, is sufficient to drive *enough* >>>> (mili) >>>> amps from that low resistance source through the conduction path within >>>> the >>>> body. >>> >>> Precisely; it isn't the voltage that's lethal, it's the current. If the >>> current isn't available, the voltage is pretty harmless. High-voltage >>> mains power lines carry a /lot/ of current, whereas high-voltage >>> 'Tazers' >>> don't. >>> >>>>>> On >>>>>> the other hand, a low voltage welding supply, will not have enough >>>>>> voltage >>>>>> behind it to push enough current through that same path to kill you, >>>>>> even >>>>>> though that supply is good for 200 amps or more. >>>>> >>>>> What voltage does a 'low voltage' welder operate at? Don't they use >>>>> capacitors to raise the supply voltage to at least 40kV? Or can >>>>> welding >>>>> really happen at 12V? >>>> >>>> Yes, arc welding can occur at 12v and, in fact, at lower voltages than >>>> this, >>>> although there are many different methods these days of generating and >>>> controlling the welding arc, though none that operate by charging caps >>>> to >>>> the sorts of voltages that you are talking about, as far as I am aware. >>>> In >>>> general, arc welding is a high current rather than high voltage system. >>>> Spot >>>> welders sometimes work by charging very large capacitors to low >>>> voltages. >>>> The reason that the low voltage arc welder is not capable of killing >>>> you, >>>> any more than a car battery can, is because although both are extremely >>>> low >>>> internal resistance sources, and hence capable of supplying large >>>> amounts >>>> of >>>> current to a low resistance load, the human body is a much higher >>>> resistance >>>> load, so the 12v is not capable of pushing enough miliamps through that >>>> path, to cause electrocution - or even electric shock. >>> >>> OK, I'm not familiar with arc welding, and I'm surprised that 12V is >>> enough to strike an arc. But your comment that it is the high current >>> that matters for creating a weld, rather supports my contention that >>> current is more dangerous than voltage. >>> >>> Electron beam welding (which you probaby won't find happening in a >>> garden >>> shed or on a building site) requires many thousand volts, but only a >>> small >>> current (less than 1A). >>> >>> The only welding I've ever done myself, involved a coke-burning forge >>> and >>> a heavy hammer. >>> >>>>>> As far as your contention that a transformer isolated supply is only >>>>>> safe >>>>>> with double insulated equipment, that simply isn't true. The only way >>>>>> that >>>>>> you can drive current through the body from such an isolation >>>>>> transformer, >>>>>> is to hang yourself across both output terminals. Either terminal to >>>>>> ground >>>>>> will present no electric shock hazard at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> Arfa >>>>> >>>>> Sounds too good to be true. >>>> >>>> Well, if you understood the principles of isolation transformers, which >>>> as >>>> well as being used on building sites for obvious reasons, are also to >>>> be >>>> found in every professional electronics workshop, to render safe, the >>>> need >>>> to work on live equipment employing such potentially lethal nasties, as >>>> switch mode power supplies, then you would know that it isn't too good >>>> to >>>> be >>>> true - it simply *is* true. Sketch it down on a piece of paper then >>>> have >>>> a >>>> good think about it. >>>> >>>> Arfa >>> >>> The only 'isolation transformers' I've come across, are earthed - and >>> either have an output restricted to 50V or less (that threshold at which >>> the human body's resistance drops substantially) or provide a good earth >>> connection for the appliance. An isolation transformer /does/ >>> disconnect >>> the connection that exists between the power station and the ground and >>> is >>> carried by the 'live' or 'hot' cable, but that is /not/ the same as the >>> safety 'earth' connection which is meant to provide a relatively safe >>> return path in case exposed metal parts of the appliance accidentally >>> become connected to the power supply. >> >> >>Neutral and ground are bonded together at the substation >> >> >>> >>> The 'earth' connection provided by an 'isolation transformer' to the >>> appliances running off it, may be arranged to effectively create a >>> 'short-circuit' on the output windings of the transformer if any current >>> flows through it, and that should trigger the safety cut-off (probably a >>> 'residual current device'). Or the 'earth' connection will pass >>> straight >>> through to the same 'earth' as the mains supply provides. >>> >>> A double-insulated appliance has no exposed metal parts that can become >>> connected to the power supply, and that's why they are permitted to be >>> used with no 'earth'. >>> >>> -- >>> -- ^^^^^^^^^^ >>> -- Whiskers >>> -- ~~~~~~~~~~ >> >>Hmmmm. Your understanding of the principles of ground isolation by use of >>a >>transformer seem very flawed I'm afraid, as also is your knowledge of >>electricity distribution schemes, and earth / neutral commonality. >> >>Arfa >> > > Whiskers is an idiot from the 24hoursupport.helpdesk newsgroup. > Probably got trolled here by the Hucker idiot. PHucker usually hangs out on alt.binaries.chatter , I can't recall seeing whiskers there. PHucker sometimes trolls on the sci.electronics groups - usually asking stupid questions then criticizing the answers he's given.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0PHSk.54310$Bk7.40254@newsfe29.ams2>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe29.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<slrnghc3uf.bnl.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <op.uke2nuxb4buhsv@fx62.mshome.net> <slrnghhb1o.bes.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <4ffc47586adave@davenoise.co.uk> <slrnghja8j.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <U3jSk.85501$i%.83610@newsfe25.ams2> <slrnghjjbg.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <7qrSk.8445$ji.2138@newsfe27.ams2> <slrnghlo20.bmt.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <W2CSk.67948$QF4.59449@newsfe13.ams2> <2bc3rq.btk.19.1@news.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1131b0,8ae7935e94fea1ee X-Google-Thread: faa3c,8ae7935e94fea1ee X-Google-Attributes: gid1131b0,gidfaa3c,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe29.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair,24hoursupport.helpdesk References: <slrnghc3uf.bnl.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <op.uke2nuxb4buhsv@fx62.mshome.net> <slrnghhb1o.bes.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <4ffc47586adave@davenoise.co.uk> <slrnghja8j.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <U3jSk.85501$i%.83610@newsfe25.ams2> <slrnghjjbg.e5j.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <7qrSk.8445$ji.2138@newsfe27.ams2> <slrnghlo20.bmt.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <W2CSk.67948$QF4.59449@newsfe13.ams2> <2bc3rq.btk.19.1@news.alt.net> Subject: Re: is third transformer hole an earth? Lines: 220 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-ID: <0PHSk.54310$Bk7.40254@newsfe29.ams2> NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.105.200.30 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe29.ams2 1226524988 81.105.200.30 (Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:08 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:08 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:23:05 -0000