Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16350Re: Battery Gell cell or Lead acid?
From: John Whitmore
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 02:16
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 02:16
17 lines
1318 bytes
1318 bytes
In article <1993Jan5.145618.8600@oclc.org> fhn@oclc.org (James Feehan) writes: >I am in the process of making a rechargeable bicycle light and wanted to know >which type of battery would be better Gell Cell or a Lead Acid. What are the >pros and cons of each? I have heard that it's not a good idea to fully >discharge a Lead Acid Gel cells are lead/acid storage batteries with a semisolid (gelatinous) acid electrolyte. You can't spill acid from them. Neither type is sensitive to cold (unless you live in Minnesota...) Neither type should be stored discharged, because the formation of insoluble sulphates on the lead make the battery difficult to charge (and raise its internal resistance, permanently). I use gel cells on my bike; it works out fine. John Whitmore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1idfegINNdsh@shelley.u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!whitReferences:
<1993Jan5.145618.8600@oclc.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!whit From: whit@carson.u.washington.edu (John Whitmore) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: Battery Gell cell or Lead acid? Message-ID: <1idfegINNdsh@shelley.u.washington.edu> Date: 6 Jan 93 02:16:48 GMT Article-I.D.: shelley.1idfegINNdsh References: <1993Jan5.145618.8600@oclc.org> Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu