Article View: sci.electronics
Article #1676012V Power Amplifier Desig
From: Richard Plourde
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:44
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 04:44
141 lines
5545 bytes
5545 bytes
Reply to Thomas W. Day regarding 12V Power Amplifier Desig TW>From: thomasd@tps.COM (Thomas W. Day) TW>Organization: Telectronics Pacing Systems TW> TW>Can anyone give me some advise on power amplifier design for 12VDC pow TW>supplies (automotive applications)? Specifically, what kinds of power TW>supplies are typically used in high power (50W+) designs? I am hoping TW>find a practical way to get a high voltage (>+/-25VDC) supply for a bi TW>amp. TW> You probably have gobs of replies on this one. So long as you remember that powerout=Vrms^2/Rload, the choices become apparent. Boost the Vrms or reduce the Rload. With a Peak-to-peak swing of, say, 12V, the Vrms (AC coupled) is 6/sqrt(2). If, however, you use *two* amplifiers, with one being the inversion of the other, and the load between the output of the two amps (a bridge circuit) then you can get Vrms of 12/sqrt(2). But, the supply voltage in an auto with the alternator running is closer to 14V. If you use a saturating bridge output stage (output comes from the collectors of two bipolar transistors ... or use a capacitive-bootstrap drive to large area (very low saturation) FETs, then 14*.707 or 10Vrms is about the best you could do. 10^2/4ohms=average power(sine wave) of 25 watts. Use 2 ohm speakers, and you have 50W. 1 ohm -> 100W. At least one commercial system that I know of used 0.7 ohm loudspeakers. (The transmission losses in reasonable wire gauges are excessive.) Or -- you *could* use an output transformer. Or -- you *could* boost the car's battery voltage. (Back in the *old* days [gasp -- I remember those old days] the approach was to use a "vibrator" (a mechanical chopper, something like a doorbell) to convert the auto battery 12V to AC, followed by a transformer to "step up" the voltage to the 100V or so required by the thermionic emission valves (vacuum tubes) in the radio. Today, of course, you would use a circuit with a topology essentially identical to the switching power supply in your computer. (A switching power supply starts by rectifying the A.C. line voltage, filtering it with capacitors to make it D.C.. In a computer switching supply, you end up with about 180 or 360 VDC, which is then chopped at a frequency between 20kHz and perhaps 200kHz, then supplied to a transformer followed by rectifier diodes and capacitor filters. In an auto, the initial step of AC to DC conversion is unnecessary ... the rest of the circuit is essentially unchanged except for the transformer winding ratios. Now, as for designing a DC to DC converter. You'll probably get loads of references for construction or theoretical articles. You *may* even get the suggestion that it's easy. It ain't. At least, not the first time. It *might* be easy, if you go with a cookbook design for which components actually exist -- but *NOT* if you need a commercially viable design that is reliable and marketable (i.e. not $20 when your competitor does it for $3). Assuming you intend to go for a full design, read the following: Recommendation #1: Understand the differences between the switching circuit types. Flyback is generally cheap overall, push-pull has a better transformer utilization. Read all you can, *particularly* the appnotes for integrated circuits designed for the job. But, don't become too easily convinced because *this* appnote is charming and reassuring while *that* appnote is obscure and overly technical. Recommendation #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7. Do *NOT* depend on a custom transformer design from a transformer manufacturer. *UNDERSTAND* what core saturation is all about, how to calculate the transformer air gap, the interrelationship between operating frequency and inductance requirements and saturation and parasitic (generally winding capacitance) components. FYI, I spent several months with a fire extinguisher because I believed that the transformer manufacturer *met* my 2A saturation specification. (The transformer actually saturated at 1.1A, but when things burst into flame in a few microseconds, it's tough to get a 'scope probe on it!) Recommendation #8: Have a current probe for your 'scope. Switching supplies operate in a way that is grossly misleading to anyone who (deep down inside) feels that current is just one of those nasty things that happens, but voltage it the thing that matters. Good luck. If *I* were designing a system, I would do everything I could to work with the intrinsic battery voltage of the auto. If it were for a "one-off" system, then no contest: buy, don't build. If it were for a commercial application, then I *might* consider a switching supply. But, a purchased unit is unlikely to do exactly what you want. The learning experience is tractable (and, if you are, like me, a masochist, rewarding) but, the first time, it ain't easy. No how. -Dick rplourde@leotech.mv.com ~ WinQwk 2.0 a#746 ~ A loaf of bread, a jug of wine and <occupant>. * Origin: Leo Technology (603)432-2517/432-0922 (HST/V32) (1:132/189)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<728156522.F00001@leotech.mv.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!mv!leotech!uucpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!mv!leotech!uucp From: rplourde@leotech.mv.com (Richard Plourde) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: 12V Power Amplifier Desig Message-ID: <728156522.F00001@leotech.mv.com> Date: 27 Jan 93 04:44:00 GMT Sender: uucp@leotech.mv.com Lines: 141