Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16855RE: Pulse Oximetery
From: Ren Hoek
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:49
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:49
34 lines
1721 bytes
1721 bytes
Jeff: You are most likely correct in saying that there were two devices in one can (or two chips in the same housing), one for 660 and one for 925 nm. I worked for a company that manufacured Pulse Ox's (hence the anonymous post). ALL of our stuff had two LED's in it, and I saw no R&D by "us" or the competition towards a 1 LED system, ALTHOUGH I think there was a way of doing it. I wouldn't trust any 1 LED system. BTW, if this hasn't been discussed before, pulse oximetry gives the percentage of oxygenated hemoglobin in the arterial blood vessels. A reading of over 94% is nice, less than that MIGHT be a problem - it depends on the situation. It gives the heath care giver a quick read on the status of the circulatory system. It's a much earlier sign of a problem than blue skin is! If you are going to have a procedure done on yourself, make sure there is a pulse ox put on you! - Mr. Anonymous ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi. Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized, and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.191628.28215@fuug.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!decwrl!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!fuug!anonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!decwrl!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!fuug!anon From: an7442@anon.penet.fi (Ren Hoek) Subject: RE: Pulse Oximetery Message-ID: <1993Jan27.191628.28215@fuug.fi> Sender: anon@fuug.fi (The Anon Administrator) Organization: Anonymous contact service X-Anonymously-To: sci.electronics Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:49:03 GMT Lines: 34