🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16981

Re: PC BOARD ETCHING QUESTIO

#16981
From: John Schuch
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:33
50 lines
2859 bytes
In article <76416@apple.apple.COM> apn@Apple.COM (Alex Novickis) writes:
>In article <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) writes:
>>I, to, have had this problem once in a while but have found most 
>>cameramen pretty darn accurate. Another thing I ALWAYS do is include
>>a rule in the artwork. Something like this:
>
>With current laser photoplotting technology, WHY ?? whould you want to 
>do reductions ?? LP's can generate things much finer than you can
>ever hope to etch.... I think that's about 4 mil traces with 4 mil
>seperations. And it usually costs me under 10$ for a 10x10" film (OK, 
>well I do need several of them... but still)
>

- Because if all you have is printer output with marginal quality 
  (contrast), 2:1 or better 4:1 traces will appear darker to the film.

- Because you can see defects in 4:1 art much easier than you can in 1:1.

- Because some people still use tape on paper for the master artwork.

- If you use a 300 dpi printer to make your 1:1 artwork, your film will
  be 300 dpi. If you use a 300 dpi printer to make 4:1 artwork, your
  film is effectivly 1200 dpi. I don't know if it's measurable but I
  can just see fuzziness on diagonal lines etched from 300 dpi film.
  Given the variabilities in the at-home etching process, I want my
  film as absolutely perfect as I can make it.

- Because it makes the process seem more complicated, and hence, more
  impressive to the in-laws.  :-)

The absolute bottom line reason? I'm more comfortable with it. You are
correct of course that 1:1 artwork from a laser printer will provide
perfectly good film. I just prefer the added safety margin.

BTW: I've tried several of the laser-to-transfer sheet-to-pcb-etch
products ( ie. TEC-200 ) and have not have good enough results to
justify getting rid of the lito-film/expose/etch method.

John
(Anybody see the segment on CNN about internet smiley faces :-) )


John


-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| John R. Schuch  -  Motorola Computer Group  -  Manufacturing Engineering |
| N7XVS - schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com - (602) 438-3008 - CompuServe: 70733.3330 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan11.173310.10026@phx.mcd.mot.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!schuch
References: <C0Iwtw.JpK@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> <76416@apple.apple.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!schuch
From: schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch)
Subject: Re: PC BOARD ETCHING QUESTIO
Message-ID: <1993Jan11.173310.10026@phx.mcd.mot.com>
Sender: news@phx.mcd.mot.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: bopper2.phx.mcd.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Tempe, Az.
References: <C0Iwtw.JpK@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> <76416@apple.apple.COM>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:33:10 GMT
Lines: 50