Article View: sci.electronics
Article #16981Re: PC BOARD ETCHING QUESTIO
From: John Schuch
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:33
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:33
50 lines
2859 bytes
2859 bytes
In article <76416@apple.apple.COM> apn@Apple.COM (Alex Novickis) writes: >In article <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) writes: >>I, to, have had this problem once in a while but have found most >>cameramen pretty darn accurate. Another thing I ALWAYS do is include >>a rule in the artwork. Something like this: > >With current laser photoplotting technology, WHY ?? whould you want to >do reductions ?? LP's can generate things much finer than you can >ever hope to etch.... I think that's about 4 mil traces with 4 mil >seperations. And it usually costs me under 10$ for a 10x10" film (OK, >well I do need several of them... but still) > - Because if all you have is printer output with marginal quality (contrast), 2:1 or better 4:1 traces will appear darker to the film. - Because you can see defects in 4:1 art much easier than you can in 1:1. - Because some people still use tape on paper for the master artwork. - If you use a 300 dpi printer to make your 1:1 artwork, your film will be 300 dpi. If you use a 300 dpi printer to make 4:1 artwork, your film is effectivly 1200 dpi. I don't know if it's measurable but I can just see fuzziness on diagonal lines etched from 300 dpi film. Given the variabilities in the at-home etching process, I want my film as absolutely perfect as I can make it. - Because it makes the process seem more complicated, and hence, more impressive to the in-laws. :-) The absolute bottom line reason? I'm more comfortable with it. You are correct of course that 1:1 artwork from a laser printer will provide perfectly good film. I just prefer the added safety margin. BTW: I've tried several of the laser-to-transfer sheet-to-pcb-etch products ( ie. TEC-200 ) and have not have good enough results to justify getting rid of the lito-film/expose/etch method. John (Anybody see the segment on CNN about internet smiley faces :-) ) John -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | John R. Schuch - Motorola Computer Group - Manufacturing Engineering | | N7XVS - schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com - (602) 438-3008 - CompuServe: 70733.3330 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.173310.10026@phx.mcd.mot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!schuchReferences:
<C0Iwtw.JpK@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> <76416@apple.apple.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.electronics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!schuch From: schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) Subject: Re: PC BOARD ETCHING QUESTIO Message-ID: <1993Jan11.173310.10026@phx.mcd.mot.com> Sender: news@phx.mcd.mot.com Nntp-Posting-Host: bopper2.phx.mcd.mot.com Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Tempe, Az. References: <C0Iwtw.JpK@news.iastate.edu> <1993Jan10.225053.28590@phx.mcd.mot.com> <76416@apple.apple.COM> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:33:10 GMT Lines: 50