🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7=bs4j=@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
>yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken) writes:
>
>
>>What's rather telling is that in defense of your flame of a Greenpeace
>>report that you never read, on grounds of an error that you merely supposed
>>was in the report, you have no more rational argument than to resort to
>>personal insult that is as clumsy as your explanation of probability
>>theory.
>
>Not to divert attention from the fact that you missed a glaring error
>in his first post.  I'd have expected it of you, yack.  After all,
>armchair scientists such as yourself rarely know the actual math.

Shucks, how can a poor greenie and armchair scientist hope to argue with
technical wizards who sort of know advanced mathematics like
logarithms? Intimidating indeed. 
-- 


yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu