Article View: sci.energy
Article #2519Re: Nuke CO2 Emissions (Was: Re: Nuke -> Solar Conversion at Rancho Seco
From: Al Thompson
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 1990 19:17
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 1990 19:17
20 lines
2081 bytes
2081 bytes
In article <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> finfrock@ncis (Scott Finfrock) writes: |In article <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> ries writes: |> |> This report lists CO2 emissions from nuclear reactors as "negligible", |> but added that a typical commercial nuclear plant emits |> "8-9.5 curies of radioactive carbon-14 annually", environmentally |> on par with natural gas fuel although the risks are "dramatically |> different." | |What the report probably didn't mention is that this |is NATURALLY OCCURING carbon-14 and that if a fossil fuel plant |releases 100 times as much carbon (and they do) then they also |release 100 times as much radio-active carbon-14! I'm puzzled. How does the C-14 from a nuclear plant differ from the "naturally occurring" C-14 found in fossil fuel? How are the risks "dramatically different"? Is somebody trying to say they are different? Then there is the K-40 emitted from fossil fuels. It has a very long half life.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<56334@bu.edu.bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!oliveb!orc!bu.edu!cs!artReferences:
<1552@mindlink.UUCP> <1234@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> <1957@rsiatl.UUCP> <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,9a23d746850c1b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,a228c7fccc38f219 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,1793190ab8250660 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: ffe14,a228c7fccc38f219 X-Google-Attributes: gidffe14,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-04-26 12:17:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!oliveb!orc!bu.edu!cs!art From: art@cs.bu.edu (Al Thompson) Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.environment,ca.environment,alt.activism Subject: Re: Nuke CO2 Emissions (Was: Re: Nuke -> Solar Conversion at Rancho Seco Keywords: Nuclear CO2 emissions over total fuel cycle Message-ID: <56334@bu.edu.bu.edu> Date: 26 Apr 90 19:17:00 GMT References: <1552@mindlink.UUCP> <1234@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> <1957@rsiatl.UUCP> <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu Reply-To: art@cs.UUCP (Al Thompson) Followup-To: sci.energy Organization: /usr/lib/news/rn/organization Lines: 20 Posted: Thu Apr 26 20:17:00 1990