Article View: sci.energy
Article #2520Re: Nuke CO2 Emissions (Was: Re: Nuke -> Solar Conversion at Rancho Seco
From: Matt Bartley
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 1990 07:44
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 1990 07:44
42 lines
3482 bytes
3482 bytes
In article <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> finfrock@ncis (Scott Finfrock) writes: >In article <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> ries writes: >> This report lists CO2 emissions from nuclear reactors as "negligible", >> but added that a typical commercial nuclear plant emits >> "8-9.5 curies of radioactive carbon-14 annually", environmentally >> on par with natural gas fuel although the risks are "dramatically >> different." >What the report probably didn't mention is that this >is NATURALLY OCCURING carbon-14 and that if a fossil fuel plant >releases 100 times as much carbon (and they do) then they also >release 100 times as much radio-active carbon-14! A book I read recently (sorry - can't remember the name) made some points about this. It said in fact that there is a significant effect of coal burning plants which is normally never heard about. It's that burning coal on large scale actually relases a goodly amount of Uranium 238, naturally in the material, which is plenty radioactive and is released as fine dust into the air. This is a significant danger if inhaled as it will stick in the lungs and alpha-decay. Alpha radiation in such direct contact is very dangerous in any significant amount. That's what the nasty stories about handling plutonium are all about - inhale or swallow any bits of it or have some stick under your skin or something, and you are screwed. This is the same kind of hazard as from radon gas. According to the accounting in the book, that amount of released U 238 is actually a lot more radiation than nuclear power plants release. Remember when you hear stuff about radon danger that radon is a naturally occurring element, not a toxic waste product as it is sometimes implied in some environmental scares. Radon is produced from indigenous uranium 238 ore in the ground which radioactively decays, and radon is a few steps down the decay chain. (after thorium and radium I believe) That's where the stuff comes from. It is not a man made hazard. -- Internet: mdbomber@portia.stanford.edu Matt Bartley Bitnet: mdbomber%portia@stanford.bitnet 73, KC6JRG Kirk: "Spock! Where the hell's that power you promised?" Spock: "One damn minute, Admiral." -- Star Trek IV : The Voyage Home
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11737@portia.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!shelby!portia!mdbomberReferences:
<1552@mindlink.UUCP> <1234@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> <1957@rsiatl.UUCP> <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10607c,a228c7fccc38f219 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: ffe14,a228c7fccc38f219 X-Google-Attributes: gidffe14,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,1793190ab8250660 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,9a23d746850c1b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-04-27 05:51:36 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!shelby!portia!mdbomber From: mdbomber@portia.Stanford.EDU (Matt Bartley) Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.environment,ca.environment,alt.activism Subject: Re: Nuke CO2 Emissions (Was: Re: Nuke -> Solar Conversion at Rancho Seco Keywords: Nuclear CO2 emissions over total fuel cycle Message-ID: <11737@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 27 Apr 90 07:44:31 GMT References: <1552@mindlink.UUCP> <1234@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> <1957@rsiatl.UUCP> <536@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> <766@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> Sender: Matt Bartley <mdbomber@portia.stanford.edu> Followup-To: sci.energy Organization: Stanford University Lines: 42 Posted: Fri Apr 27 08:44:31 1990