Article View: sci.energy
Article #2727Re: Carnot is dead ! Schaeffer disproves 2nd "law" !
From: Harry H Conover
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 01:03
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 01:03
39 lines
2789 bytes
2789 bytes
Stefan Hartmann (harti@uropax.contrib.de) wrote:
: Hi,
: which university wants to prove or disprove Mr. Schaeffer's invention ?
: Please let me know.
: I can arrange contact with him, so we could put this on a whole new level
: of research to get the device "university approved" !
: Please email me at:
: harti@contrib.de
: Regards, Stefan.
Stefan, I doubt any too many of the University 'Folk' will be standing
in line to analyze and report on the work of a man evidently devoted to
disproving the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. An understandable situation.
However, I have an alternative suggestion"
As I mentioned before, I am a physicist with 30 years combined
physics and engineering experience, and would be happy to review
and comment on these findings. If you wish, I will the happy to submit
my report in letter form to 'Physical Review Letters.'
I eagerly await receipt of the theoretical abstracts,
concept analysis, and analysis of experimental findings.
Fair enough?
Harry C.
ps. If its important for you to have a university imprimatur,
(since I work in industry), I will share this material with
associates at MIT. To be quite honest with you, their incentive
for doing so will not so much be the merit of the good doctor's
work, as much as their eternal search for future receipients of
the MIT 'IG' awards. I can however, assure you of receiving a
fair, honest, and competent appraisal.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<38f14h$59t@sundog.tiac.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!max.tiac.net!conoverReferences:
<5ZPnmZ9uldB@shb.contrib.de> <38egoq$940@uropax.contrib.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e415,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e415,public X-Google-Thread: 1141dc,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gid1141dc,public X-Google-Thread: 107e5d,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gid107e5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10506c,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gid10506c,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: fd325,90606d251ec1c359 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd325,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-23 18:10:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!max.tiac.net!conover From: conover@max.tiac.net (Harry H Conover) Newsgroups: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,cl.energie.alternativen,sci.energy.hydrogen,sci.environment,sci.materials Subject: Re: Carnot is dead ! Schaeffer disproves 2nd "law" ! Followup-To: sci.energy,alt.energy.renewable,cl.energie.alternativen,sci.energy.hydrogen,sci.environment,sci.materials Date: 24 Oct 1994 01:03:13 GMT Organization: The Internet Access Company Lines: 45 Message-ID: <38f14h$59t@sundog.tiac.net> References: <5ZPnmZ9uldB@shb.contrib.de> <38egoq$940@uropax.contrib.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: max.tiac.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]