Article View: sci.geo.eos
Article #8Re: CHALLENGE FROM ICONOCLAST 4
From: Daniel Packman
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:00
26 lines
1680 bytes
1680 bytes
In article <43v3br$p9s@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> dav-bra@ix.netcom.com (DAVID BRANTZ ) writes:
> OZONE DEPLETION FALLACY by David Brantz
This extensive post, particularly because it is rife with misinformation,
deserves a complete answer. I don't havxe the time today to do this, but
if no one else responds, I'll dust off the old ozone fallacy file and
respond within a few days.
Any reasoned response should point out the important role of polar
stratospheric clouds which this letter oddly is silent on.
>... In the real world, the chlorine in the stratosphere is nearly
>all natural. The fluorocarbons provide a very small portion
>of the chlorine. This will be obvious further in the analysis.
Blatantly false statements like this should also be addressed.
The solubility of naturally ocurring chlorine vs the insolubility
of cfcs should also be addressed.
Later...
--
Dan Packman NCAR INTERNET: pack@ncar.UCAR.EDU
(303) 497-1427 1850 Table Mesa Drive Web: http://www.acd.ucar.edu/~pack
Boulder, CO 80303-5602 NSI/DECNET: 9583::PACK
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<44a0fi$sn0@ncar.ucar.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<43v3br$p9s@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 100ecf,67a5861ea100fed8 X-Google-Attributes: gid100ecf,public X-Google-Thread: 108a14,67a5861ea100fed8 X-Google-Attributes: gid108a14,public From: pack@acd.ucar.edu (Daniel Packman) Subject: Re: CHALLENGE FROM ICONOCLAST 4 Date: 1995/09/26 Message-ID: <44a0fi$sn0@ncar.ucar.edu> X-Deja-AN: 110809634 references: <43v3br$p9s@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> organization: Ntl Center for Atmospheric Research - Atmospheric Chemistry Div newsgroups: sci.geo.eos,earth.general