Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data.

Thread View: sci.image.processing

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by J C Flack Tue, 04 Aug 1992 18:35

#102

Author: J C Flack
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 18:35

15 lines
1046 bytes

I am trying to locate any research that evaluates the effectiveness/validity
of standard segmentation processes (i.e.  region growing, split and merge,
thresholding, clustering) --- in the context of *Remotely Sensed* imagery
(i.e. Landsat, Spot, various airborne things). I am similarly interested in
an evaluation of edge detection in remote sensing.

Can anyone help ?
(I will post a summary)

-------------------------------
Julien Flack,
Department of Computer Studies,
Leeds University.
email:julien@scs.leeds.ac.uk

Re: Segmentation and Remotely Sensed Data.

#104

Author: Eric Majani
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 22:32

20 lines
1233 bytes

In article <1992Aug4.183535.5475@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> julien@scs.leeds.ac.uk (J C Flack) writes:
>
>I am trying to locate any research that evaluates the effectiveness/validity
>of standard segmentation processes (i.e.  region growing, split and merge,
>thresholding, clustering) --- in the context of *Remotely Sensed* imagery
>(i.e. Landsat, Spot, various airborne things). I am similarly interested in
>an evaluation of edge detection in remote sensing.
>

Try:

Hierarchical Segmentation using a composite criterion for remotely sensed imagery
by Goldberg-M and Zhang-JY
Photogrammetria
Vol 42 issue 3, pp. 87-96
1987

-Eric Majani

PS: Let me know what else you find out.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads