Article View: sci.lang.translation
Article #123Re: universal written language - a protocol for machine translation
From: Mike Adams
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00
47 lines
2774 bytes
2774 bytes
Why does it have to be direct translation? Why not convert the meaning from
one lingo, such as English, then into a Symbol for the idea/concept, and
then back into the other lingo, such as Spanish?
I know still some room of oppses, but ...
Man=symbol for man (like you see on the bathroom door)=spanish for man.
Mike
George Ho wrote:
> I used to be fascinated by the idea of machine translation. After years
> of practice in the real world translation, I suppose machine translation
> is just a toy for people in the ivory tower.
>
> I don't believe machine translation can really become commercialized in
> the near future. Every good translator knows that translation does not
> only involve linguistic skills but cover a wide range of knowledge
> database. They must be very versatile. Otherwise there will be no "guts"
> in their works. Besides, a good translator, like a good writer, depends
> on their inspiration more than often and tends to change their wording
> from time to time to make their translation as perfect as possible. I
> don't believe a computer can do that sort of self-polishing at all.
--
Mike Adams
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderator of:
AdultHumor-L@makelist.com Humor
Poetry-L@makelist.com Poetry
Future-History-L@onelist.com Future History of Humanity and Beyond
Abrigon-L@makelist.com My Cyber Family
Abrigon-World@makelist.com My Gaming World - High Tech looks like
Magic.
Alaska Alaska, says it all.
Life in non sequitur, but does that stop me from living?
So who cancelled my reality check anyways?
If I wanted your chain letters, and porn
I would take it from your cold dead HD
<html>
<img src="http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/1429/me.jpg">
<br>
</html>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37483088.7EE15E2E@uaf.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7ho49v$nmj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3744016E.606F7822@ihug.co.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 15b514,f82743ad9aebddde X-Google-Attributes: gid15b514,public X-Google-Thread: 107100,f82743ad9aebddde X-Google-Attributes: gid107100,public X-Google-Thread: 107fc6,f82743ad9aebddde X-Google-Attributes: gid107fc6,public X-Google-Thread: 100923,f82743ad9aebddde X-Google-Attributes: gid100923,public From: Mike Adams <fsmca1@uaf.edu> Subject: Re: universal written language - a protocol for machine translation Date: 1999/05/23 Message-ID: <37483088.7EE15E2E@uaf.edu> X-Deja-AN: 481498886 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7ho49v$nmj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3744016E.606F7822@ihug.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Raven Grafix Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: mike_adams61@hotmail.com Newsgroups: sci.lang.translation,comp.ai.nat-lang,cu.ml.linguist-list,alt.language.artificial