Article View: sci.lang
Article #1961Re: Christmas linguistics
From: JAREA
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 03:01
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 03:01
21 lines
1501 bytes
1501 bytes
In article <1gq0m3INNp2l@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de> simon@fsinfo.cs.uni-sb.de (Julia Simon) writes: > >As an Indo-European linguist I've learned that at some time (looooong ago) the >Romans pronounced it "k". Later it became a fricative or affricate before "e" >and "i" (as it still is in the modern Romance languages - "s" in French, "ch" >in Italian and (I think) Rhaeto-Romanic, "th" in Spanish, ...). > > Julia 8-) It is worth pointing out that it is _not_ true that "the modern Romance languages" changed /k/ followed by front vowels. Most of them did. In most of them it did, but in (most varieties of) Sard, it remains a stop initially (and in some varieties medially), as in /kimbe/ 'five', /kentu/ 'hundred'. The last I heard "Spanish" spoken, 'hundred' was /sjiento/: not all Spanish is Castillian pronunciation. Outside of these picky details, I refer you to Alderson's fine post for the truth about Latin pronunciation, short of Allen's fine little book, /vaks laetajn@/.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<168C0135BF.JAREA@UKCC.UKY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ukma!newsReferences:
<01GSF2YTY5Q8I7IMKE@kiera.ericsson.se> <1gq0m3INNp2l@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ukma!news
From: JAREA@UKCC.UKY.EDU
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Re: Christmas linguistics
Message-ID: <168C0135BF.JAREA@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Date: 18 Dec 92 03:01:29 GMT
References: <01GSF2YTY5Q8I7IMKE@kiera.ericsson.se>
<1gq0m3INNp2l@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de>
Sender: news@ms.uky.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Kentucky
Lines: 21
Nntp-Posting-Host: ukcc.uky.edu