Article View: sci.lang
Article #1962Re: "Nominative" absolute?
From: connolly
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 05:32
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 05:32
52 lines
2564 bytes
2564 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.085109.45712@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: > In article <1992Dec16.002418.4636@memstvx1.memst.edu>, connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu writes: >> English school grammar teaches that English possesses a construction >> known as the "nominative absolute". Examples: >> >> The war being over, he returned home. >> Gaul having been conquered, Caesar returned to Rome. >> ... >> >> In Latin, and all other languages where I have found such a construction, >> the case of the absolute is precisely *not* nominative. Latin, as all >> linguists would once have known, used the ablative, and Old English >> used the dative. > > Medieval Latin however used both the nominative and accusative > absolutes. An example of each from Harrington's _Mediaeval Latin_: > > omnia genera tormentorum adhibita > all kinds of torments being applied With all due respect, how do we know that this is not accusative? > quem peremptum > who having been destroyed > >> The question then arises: on what basis do we say that the English >> absolute construction contains a "nominative"? Pronouns are quite >> rare, but for me the only natural case with an occasional pronominal >> absolute would be precisely accusative. >> >> Him being such a fool, of course she went off with another man. > > Why not just "oblique?" Or "objective", the term they used in my schooldays? It hardly matters. >> Furthermore, a nominative would be unparalleled in English, since the >> nominative is otherwise found only before *finite* verbs, which >> _being_ is not >> >> So, people: Does anyone have an idea how the *nominative* absolute >> made its way into our school grammars? > > The term, along with "accusative absolute," could have come from work > on Medieval Latin. I rather doubt it. When our school grammars were developed, medieval Latin was regarded as barbarity itself, which is perhaps why I've always liked it. Yet I must confess I can't ever recall seeing a nominative or accusative absolute in the flesh in medieval texts. --Leo Connolly
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec17.233249.4681@memstvx1.memst.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!utkcs2!memstvx1!connollyReferences:
<1992Dec16.002418.4636@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec17.085109.45712@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!utkcs2!memstvx1!connolly From: connolly@memstvx1.memst.edu Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: "Nominative" absolute? Message-ID: <1992Dec17.233249.4681@memstvx1.memst.edu> Date: 17 Dec 92 23:32:49 -0600 References: <1992Dec16.002418.4636@memstvx1.memst.edu> <1992Dec17.085109.45712@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Organization: Memphis State University Lines: 52