Article View: sci.lang
Article #2058Clicks are stops, right?
From: miner
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:25
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:25
16 lines
1101 bytes
1101 bytes
I hold that clicks are stops, since they, like stops, can be readily prenasalized and aspirated. (I know it is claimed that aspirated fricatives occur too, but (a) they're much rarer than aspirated stops and (b) I would have to see evidence that they aren't really sequences.) I thought of this when looking at the ASCII/IPA, where clicks are to be represented by diacritic "!" following the homorganic stops, which by my lights is a good choice. Next question is, Do they come from stops historically, or what? My guess would be that since they're original only in Khoi-San (?), not much comparative evidence is available. -- miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu | Graecis ac barbaris, sapientibus et opinions are my own | insipientibus debitor sum
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.112557.46117@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!minerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!miner From: miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Clicks are stops, right? Message-ID: <1993Jan5.112557.46117@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Date: 5 Jan 93 11:25:57 CST Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services Lines: 16