🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.lang
Article #2058

Clicks are stops, right?

#2058
From: miner
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:25
16 lines
1101 bytes
I hold that clicks are stops, since they, like stops, can be
readily prenasalized and aspirated.  (I know it is claimed that
aspirated fricatives occur too, but (a) they're much rarer than
aspirated stops and (b) I would have to see evidence that they aren't
really sequences.)

I thought of this when looking at the ASCII/IPA, where clicks are to
be represented by diacritic "!" following the homorganic stops, which
by my lights is a good choice.

Next question is, Do they come from stops historically, or what?
My guess would be that since they're original only in Khoi-San (?), not
much comparative evidence is available.
-- 
miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu | Graecis ac barbaris, sapientibus et
opinions are my own      | insipientibus debitor sum
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan5.112557.46117@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!miner

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!miner
From: miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Clicks are stops, right?
Message-ID: <1993Jan5.112557.46117@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 93 11:25:57 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 16