Article View: sci.lang
Article #2059Re: Tones in PIE?
From: rahul bonner
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:37
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:37
43 lines
2740 bytes
2740 bytes
In an article on PIE accent, alderson@cisco.com (Rich Alderson) writes: >Vedic Sanskrit had a pitch rise on the accented syllable within a word, with a >slightly lower than normal pitch on the immediately preceding syllable and a >much lower than normal pitch on the immediately following syllable. . . . The >accented syllable is called _udatta_ "raised" in Sanskrit grammatical >treatises, and the following is called _anudatta_ "not raised." Here is a passage from one of those treatises, in my own rough translation: The words _uda:tta_, _anuda:tta_, and _svarita_ are well known both in the world and in the veda in the sense of a pitch (_svara_) that is a quality of a speech sound. Here (i.e., in this and the next two sutras) they are given as technical designations of vowels that possess such a quality. A vowel that is pronounced high is called _uda:tta_. "High" is not to be understood to refer to the force of the sound, as when we say, "He speaks 'high,'" i.e., "He speaks out loud," or "He recites 'high,'" i.e., "He recites out loud." How, then, is it to be understood? "High" is with respect to the place of articulation; it is a word that modifies the term that is here being defined. Speech sounds are produced at the five places of articulation, and these places of articulation have different parts; a vowel that is produced in the upper part of a place of articulation is called _uda:tta_. While it is being produced, the organs of articulation are tense and contracted, the pitch is rough and dry, and the opening of the throat is constricted. This is from the _Ka:'sika: V.rtti_, a fifth century (?) commentary on Pa:.nini's _A.s.ta:dhya:yi:_. It is the comment on sutra 1.2.29, _uccair uda:tta.h_. What I find noteworthy here is that the accent is being related to the places of articulation in the mouth. Whenever I have thought about Old Indic accent, which is admittedly not very frequently, I have imagined it as something more or less musical: the _uda:tta_ was a few notes higher than the _anuda:tta_. But this passage clearly says that a vowel with the _uda:tta_ is pronounced in a different place than a vowel with the _anuda:tta_. Rahul Bonner
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan23.033753.10519@midway.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!bon6References:
<1993Jan16.185630.25871@enea.se> <1993Jan20.184737.15289@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.lang Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!bon6 From: bon6@quads.uchicago.edu (rahul bonner) Subject: Re: Tones in PIE? Message-ID: <1993Jan23.033753.10519@midway.uchicago.edu> Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System) Reply-To: bon6@midway.uchicago.edu Organization: University of Chicago References: <1993Jan16.185630.25871@enea.se> <1993Jan20.184737.15289@leland.Stanford.EDU> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:37:53 GMT Lines: 46