Article View: sci.lang
Article #3033Are 'spatial relations' Universals?
From: Steve MacGregor
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 00:00
24 lines
1709 bytes
1709 bytes
According to gusty@clark.net (Harlan Messinger):
>Similarly for here/there or here/there close by/there far away:
>
> French: ici/la`
> Chinse: zhe/na
> Spanish: aqui'/ai'/alli' (but aca'/alla')
Japanese: koko/soko/ako {I believe this is correct -- Steve}
>
>What other variations exist?
It's always seemed strange that Esperanto has only =one= word for all
three: tie = there; tio = that; tia = that kind; etc.
To talk of something near, you need to stick in the particle "c^i",
which turns the meaning around: c^i-tie = here; c^i-tio = this;
c^i-tia = this kind, etc. I haven't seen anyone attempt to simulate the
three-way distinction of Spanish and Japanese, but it could probably be
done.
--
---- <http://www.indirect.com/www/stevemac/ttt-hejmo.html>
--------
------------------ Steve MacGregor, Phoenix, AZ
------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3toq33$2au@globe.indirect.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f66d0,6f46e3252c134b0a X-Google-Attributes: gidf66d0,public X-Google-Thread: 10870e,6f46e3252c134b0a X-Google-Attributes: gid10870e,public X-Google-Thread: 10a20a,6f46e3252c134b0a X-Google-Attributes: gid10a20a,public X-Google-Thread: 10681a,6f46e3252c134b0a X-Google-Attributes: gid10681a,public From: stevemac@bud.indirect.com (Steve MacGregor) Subject: Are 'spatial relations' Universals? Date: 1995/07/09 Message-ID: <3toq33$2au@globe.indirect.com> X-Deja-AN: 105915645 x-disclaimer: I'm not overweight; I'm underheight! organization: Department of Redundancy Department newsgroups: sci.lang,sci.cognitive,bit.listserv.geograph,sci.anthropology