🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <burt.721346028@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca>, burt@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca (Burt Voorhees) writes:
|> 
|> Also, check out Giere for one of the "cognitive/constructive" approaches;
|> Salmon and Hemphill for covering law ideas; and a book edited by
|> Fredrick Suppes (can't recall title at the moment) which goes over
|> a number of different views.
|> burt voorhees

That's Fred Suppe (no 's':  That's Pat Suppes).  The book is _The
Structure of Scientific Theories_.  It is a good book in terms of
explicating a number of positions (very thick as well).  By the
way, it's 'Hempel'.  A good (though aging) treatment of the D/N
model is to be found in Nagel's _The Structure of Science_.  One
should also look at Clark Glymour's _Theory and Evidence_.


-- 
Gary H. Merrill  [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Dr. / Cary, NC  27513 / (919) 677-8000
sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com ... !mcnc!sas!sasghm