🚀 go-pugleaf

No, its all real, I have seen the movies on it and what you see on the
movies is all real, they wouldn't make a movie like that if it was false ,
now, would they ??

"Terry Russell" <trochilus@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3d2d2739$0$823$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> "Don H" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:XI8X8.32648$Hj3.98137@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > Did NASA land men on the moon, or was it all just a hoax?
> > Recent TV program claims it was a hoax, but this is apparently refuted
at
> > http://www.badastronomy.com
> > ==============================================
>
> In the long run what measurable difference does it make to your situation
> if it was a hoax or real?
>
>
> If it was a hoax then you would expect to see ..., you would not
> expect to see..
> If it was not a hoax then you would expect to see ..., you would not
> expect to see..
> (fill in the blanks)
> How would hoaxers benefit?
> How do those who assert it was a hoax benefit?
>
> The main thing against all conspiracies is there is always, eventually,
> a leak, a paper trail , tourists want to visit or someone tries to
replicate
> the results. Just look at the large corporations, billion dollar black
holes
> with no results have a habit of swallowing all around them within a few
> years.
>
> It made no sense to send men to the moon at that time,
> it was and is dangerous , expensive and of no scientific purpose.
> It was a public relations exercise, so all the above hold no weight.
>
>
> http://vesuvius.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/spinoff.html
>
> As the conspiracy theorists pack up their digital videos in their
> velcro bags check their email and call HQ on the mobile phone
> they can be sure there is no evidence supporting a moon landing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>