Article View: sci.materials
Article #491Re: SOI device fabrication research
From: Alan Uncle Al Schwartz
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 00:00
39 lines
2881 bytes
2881 bytes
Bobby Mozumder <snm6394@vmsmail.isc.rit.edu> wrote:
>For my microelectronics engineering senior project at RIT, I'm trying
>to create a bonded and etchbacked SOI device using a process similiar
>to S. Nakamura et al. as described in IEDM Technical Digest, '95 (p.
>889). They created SOI DRAM devices by going through a normal CMOS
>process and then flipping it over to bond on a substrate and etching
>away the back side until they were able to isolate the devices, thus
>creating SOI devices after fabrication of the devices, as opposed to
>buying SOI wafers and then creating the devices on top of that.
(snip)
>I need some help specifically on the bonding process. Can anyone
>give me good references on the actual bonding process, preferably
>something that is available over the net? Will BPSG bond with it
>at that temperature? What about air pockets? How do people get
>rid of that? Is this method safe and cheap? Will the bonding
>affect the device? (I will start SUPREME4 simulations next week,
>but in the above paper, they were able to create 64MB dram devices.)
I don't know beans about solid state fabrication. However, if you take
two (reasonably) flat surfaces, give them a quick ion wash in vacuo
(clean surface), touch them together, press and and warm (and maybe set a
voltage across for a little mobile ion migration)... you end up with a
monolith. I know physics grad student who touched two silica optical
flats together in a vacuum chamber. It may only have been van der Waals,
but it was enough.
--
Alan "Uncle Al" Schwartz
UncleAl0@ix.netcom.com ("zero" before "@")
http://vvv.com/adsint/freehand/uncleal/
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
(Uncle Al has been Officially convinced to "voluntarily" shut down his
homepage. You can own his complete 529 essay collection. Surf by
before it dies!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4isc47$bst@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31518B78.B6B@vmsmail.isc.rit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4886,a4829828bd9bebbe X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,public X-Google-Thread: 1141dc,a4829828bd9bebbe X-Google-Attributes: gid1141dc,public X-Google-Thread: fac55,a4829828bd9bebbe X-Google-Attributes: gidfac55,public X-Google-Thread: 1337a6,a4829828bd9bebbe X-Google-Attributes: gid1337a6,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a4829828bd9bebbe X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public From: Alan \"Uncle Al\" Schwartz <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: SOI device fabrication research Date: 1996/03/21 Message-ID: <4isc47$bst@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 143450798 references: <31518B78.B6B@vmsmail.isc.rit.edu> to: snm6394@vmsmail.isc.rit.edu content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: The Noble Krell x-netcom-date: Thu Mar 21 11:53:43 AM PST 1996 mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: sci.materials,ieee.general,sci.chem,sci.physics,comp.vlsi x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1PE (Windows; I; 16bit)