Thread View: sci.materials
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Jon J Thaler
Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:52
Re: Super Conducting Supercollider
Author: Jon J Thaler
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:52
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:52
20 lines
1405 bytes
1405 bytes
rcj@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com (R.C. Jones) says: > I know that the Macneil Leherer hour on PBS is > a political program, but I can't help asking if > my ears heard Rustum Roy say " Nobel Laureates in > physics! Who cares about them. " > What are the more scientific opinions about the value > of the Super Conducting SuperCollider program? Despite Rustum Roy's extremism (he said that the SSC is not science), the main issue is one of cost. Even Dale Bass would not object to the SSC if it only cost $10.95. The main scientific goal of the SSC is to discover the Higgs boson or its dynamical equivalent. One of these must exist if spontaneous symmetry breaking is responsible for low energy particle physics phenomenology. The energy of the SSC was chosen to ensure that theoretical predictions will be confronted by data. In the PBS program, I thought that Bumpers and Johnston, the politicians, did a much better job of presenting their cases than did Schwitters and Roy, the scientists.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads