Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1078Re: Advantages/Disadvantages of Galerkin Method
From: Sadasivan Shankar
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 19:04
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 19:04
26 lines
2309 bytes
2309 bytes
Galerkin methods with finite elements are very widely used for parabolic systems like Navire-Stokes. The conventional Galerkin Finite Elements (GFEM) are as estable for these systems. However, for predominantly hyperbolic systems (Euler Equations, Vlasov Equations), GFEM loses its stability. As a result, some form of stabilization is necessary like a streamline upwinding has to be added. There are also other ways to stabilize the GFEM for hyperbolic systemsby using the so-called Petrov-Glaerkin techniques in which you have the rial functions different from the test functions. SOme error estimates are available for different methods (Claes Johnson (1986), T.J. Hughes (1982)) and so on. Now for non-linear systems; It is well known that Navier-Stokes equations can be primary source of chaos under appropriate parameter conditions (the Lorenz equations). It is possible to use GFEM for such systems as well. However, it should be noted that chaotic behavior is a characteristic of the "system of equations that one is solving" and will manifest independent of the numerical technique. Appropriate manipulation of the same technique (GFEM for instanace) should not be a problem to study this behavior. It has also been observed that systems of equations can change their behavior inside the domain. FOr example parabolic systems can be come hyperbolic (boundary layer flow, non-newtonian polymeric fluids). In cases like these, GFEM (assuming that stabilizing properties are already incoporated) can be used. Hope that the above lines answer at least some of your questions. S.Shankar Tech CAD INTEL Corporation
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0JuCA.E1@inews.Intel.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!td2cad!sshankarReferences:
<yg!31aq@rpi.edu> <1993Jan8.083828@roper.mc.ti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!td2cad!sshankar From: sshankar@td2cad.intel.com (Sadasivan Shankar) Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis Subject: Re: Advantages/Disadvantages of Galerkin Method Message-ID: <C0JuCA.E1@inews.Intel.COM> Date: 8 Jan 93 19:04:57 GMT References: <yg!31aq@rpi.edu> <1993Jan8.083828@roper.mc.ti.com> Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System) Reply-To: sshankar@td2cad.intel.com (Sadasivan Shankar) Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA USA Lines: 26 Nntp-Posting-Host: tcadrs