Article View: sci.math.research
Article #162Algebraic topology question
From: Chris Phillips
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 01:27
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 01:27
36 lines
2712 bytes
2712 bytes
Let P_n be the product of n copies of the 2-sphere S^2. In the singular cohomology group H^2 (P_n, Z/rZ), let g_1, ..., g_n be the generators corresponding to the factors of P_n. I have a topological space E, an element x in H^2 (E, Z/rZ), and a continuous map f from P_n to E such that f*(x) = g_1 + ... + g_n. Here E is an open subset of a compact manifold, and even probably has finitely generated cohomology. The object is to get lower bounds on the dimension of the manifold that contains E, and which go to infinity when n goes to infinity. A while ago, I did something similar using Z coefficients instead of Z/rZ. In this case, f*(x^n) = (g_1 + ... + g_n)^n, which is n! times a generator of H^2n (P_n, Z) = Z. So H^2n (E, Z) is not zero. In the present case, r is fixed (and presumably much smaller than n), but (g_1 + ... + g_n)^n is zero as soon as r divides n!. If r is prime, this means the method only works for n<r. In that case, if n=r then a cohomology operation called a generalized Pontrjagin power, when applied to g_1 + ... + g_r, yields a nonzero element of H^2r (P_r, Z/r^2Z). Therefore H^2r (E, Z/r^2Z) is not zero. But even this seems not to be helpful for n>r. What I am really hoping to find is a cohomology operation which one can apply to g_1 + ... + g_n and get a nonzero element of H^2n (P_n, A) for some coefficient group A, for n >> r. Of course, it doesn't have to be exactly H^2n; anything close would help. Any other ideas would also be appreciated. Of course, what I want may be false. If somebody can produce for me an open subset U of R^5, say, and a continuous map f from S^2 x S^2 x S^2 to U such that the restrictions of f to the sets S^2 x point x point, point x S^2 x point, and point x point x S^2 are all homotopically nontrivial, then I would probably give up on this approach entirely. Two additional items that might possibly be relevant: E is probably simply connected, and H_2 (E, Z) is probably isomorphic to Z/rZ. (So the U above should really be simply connected.) Please reply to phillips@math.uoregon.edu. Thanks.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9301020127.AA24551@bright.uoregon.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!danShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.research Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!dan From: phillips@bright.uoregon.edu (Chris Phillips) Subject: Algebraic topology question Message-ID: <9301020127.AA24551@bright.uoregon.edu> Originator: dan@symcom.math.uiuc.edu Sender: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu> Followup-To: poster X-Submissions-To: sci-math-research@uiuc.edu Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana X-Administrivia-To: sci-math-research-request@uiuc.edu Approved: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 01:27:47 GMT Lines: 37