Thread View: sci.math.research
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by le
Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10
Union of flat cells in R^3
Author: le
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10
36 lines
1530 bytes
1530 bytes
I believe that the following statement is true, but I have
been unable to find it in the literature
(by the way, I know that \beta(3,3,3,0) is false).
Assume that D_1,...,D_n (for n >= 2) are locally flat 3-cells
in Euclidian 3-space R^3 such that
all the D_i's have exactly one point p in common; i.e.,
D_i \cap D_j = Bd D_i \cap Bd D_j = {p}
for all pairwise distinct i and j.
If for each \epsilon > 0 there exists a flat 2-sphere R (e.g.
R is homeomorphic to S^2 and flat) such that
p is contained in the interior of R,
the diameter of R is smaller than \epsilon, and
the sphere R intersects each D_i in a simple closed curve;
then the cells D_1,...,D_n are simultaneously flat; e.g., there
exists a "flattening" homeomorphism h of R^3 such that h(D_i) is a
simplex with h(p) as a vertex (for i=1,...,n).
Any suggestions, hints are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
(Le, Computer Science Dep.)
le@fuhainf.fernuni-hagen.de
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads