Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #301Least Square Errors
From: anthony.r.rizzo
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 15:05
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 15:05
39 lines
2541 bytes
2541 bytes
This is probably something that's a piece of cake for all you stat-pros out there, but for a mere engineer the question requires some thought and, possibly, some help. I have experimental data, a calibration curve of sorts, for the thermal output of a strain gauge. I've fitted a 4th degree polynomial to the data, by the method of least square errors, and I'm using the polynomial to correct strain gauge readings taken at various temperatures. My quandary is that the polynomial does not pass through the one point of which I'm dead certain, (20,0). The instrument with which the data were collected was zeroed at 20 C. So, the curve, ideally, should pass through (20,0). Two options are available to me. First, I can simply change the value of the constant term in my polynomial, so as to shift the curve up or down by the required amount. But this will give me a new curve that DOES NOT minimize the squares of the errors. Second, I can re-derive the equations such that the fitted curve is CONSTRAINED to pass through (20,0). (This would not be unlike the application of boundary conditions by the theoretical method in finite element problems.) Doing so should insure that the curve pass through (20,0), while still giving me coefficients that minimize the square of the errors. Now my questions: 1) Is this legitimate, or am I just whistling Dixie? 2) Is this a common thing to do? If so, any references? I thank you now, for your help later. So does my employer, my wife, my children, my mortgage company, and the tax sucking municipality that I live in. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= * Anthony R. Rizzo | * * The FEA Group | There's no shortage of engineers in the USA. * * AT&T Bell Laboratories | * * att.com!homxc!rizzo | There's only a shortage of engineering. * * (201) 386-2565 | * =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep9.150541.15735@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzo From: rizzo@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (anthony.r.rizzo) Subject: Least Square Errors Message-ID: <1992Sep9.150541.15735@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:05:41 GMT Lines: 40