Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #302Re: Least Square Errors
From: Jerry Dallal
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 19:27
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 19:27
10 lines
972 bytes
972 bytes
In article <1992Sep9.142202.352@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu>, I wrote: <some stuff . . .> As a post script, let me add that if the data were within sampling variability of the fitted curve, that is, I were confident that this was not a case of model failure, I would seriously consider fitting the constrained model. The consideration would revolve around whether the response should be *exactly* 0 at X=20. I don't know enough about your problem to make that judgement by myself.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep9.142722.353@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!news.tufts.edu!sage.hnrc.tufts.edu!jerryReferences:
<1992Sep9.150541.15735@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Sep9.142202.352@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!news.tufts.edu!sage.hnrc.tufts.edu!jerry From: jerry@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu (Jerry Dallal) Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Subject: Re: Least Square Errors Message-ID: <1992Sep9.142722.353@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu> Date: 9 Sep 92 19:27:22 GMT References: <1992Sep9.150541.15735@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Sep9.142202.352@nutmeg.hnrc.tufts.edu> Organization: USDA HNRC at Tufts University Lines: 10