Re: Would the burn be white if its proteins did not didn't coagulate?

Article View: sci.med.pathology

Article #48

#48

From: PD
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:38

19 lines
2274 bytes

Radium wrote:
> PD wrote:
>
> > I suggest you scrape some of the skin off at the
> > burn site and put it under a microscope.
>
> What will I accomplish by doing the above? I doubt I will see anything
> significant under the microscope.

I'm not sure I agree. Here's another example you can try. Egg whites
raw and egg whites cooked (denatured).

Moreover, since protein is protein whether its alive or dead, you could
test whether the protein is denatured in a burn by using a piece of
chicken skin from the supermarket.

PD

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1136435926.050323.53340@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1136404116.755984.311890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1136404549.017084.43140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136422108.387993.143340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1136430073.826581.32190@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136431032.704485.15000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f60cd,b749b09067784e6a
X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,b749b09067784e6a
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b749b09067784e6a
X-Google-Thread: f4886,b749b09067784e6a
X-Google-Thread: 105b48,b749b09067784e6a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf60cd,gidfd9c4,gid10b271,gidf4886,gid105b48,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med.pathology,bionet.molbio.proteins,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.med
Subject: Re: Would the burn be white if its proteins did not didn't coagulate?
Date: 4 Jan 2006 20:38:46 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <1136435926.050323.53340@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
References: <1136404116.755984.311890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <1136404549.017084.43140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1136422108.387993.143340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <1136430073.826581.32190@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <1136431032.704485.15000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.80.226.133
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136435931 30932 127.0.0.1 (5 Jan 2006 04:38:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 04:38:51 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1136431032.704485.15000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.80.226.133;
   posting-account=rCfV9AwAAAB6GOp4HP3aWrPYi4NqdB_x

Reply to Parent Message