🚀 go-pugleaf

Never done this myself.

However if you have a new theory, either its theoretical stuff like Stephen
Hawking style and you base your theory on a stack of well known theories and
prove it that way. Its not known that you are right and so you can't
'proove' it but thats why its a theory. Theory of relativity and so forth..

If it were a physical phenomena that he had a theory on then it would be a
matter of devising an experiment to collect measurements and then prove that
the theory is correct to a statistical bound like 99% of the time its
correct or something.

i'm  a student myself, so this is just how I'd go about it. Of course
usually if a student has some theory then they would probalby need the name
of a lecturer ont he paper to give it any credence :)


""Wolfram"" <remove_this!helbrecht@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:9n7771$5kdq6$1@ID-40201.news.dfncis.de...
> Hello everybody,
>
> Assumed someone had found out something new. He's got an idea
> about how something specific could/an idea about, what the reason
> for something. I.e. he could imagine, his idea could be the base
> for a new theory.
>
> How could he proof it? What should be his steps?
>
>
> Assumed you were a student. You'd never expected to discover
> something new, ever. You assume, it could be the base of a new
> theory. So you have to decide, what to do next.
>
> Yes, i know, it's very improbably, but what if _is_ a base for a
> new theory?
>
> --
>
> best regards,
> Wolfram
>
> @Cologne, Germany
>