Thread View: sci.misc
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Hans DU BUF
Tue, 28 Jul 1992 10:44
Whale killing - other animals
Author: Hans DU BUF
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 10:44
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 10:44
13 lines
1076 bytes
1076 bytes
Last week or so when someone started the discussion about the Norwegian "scientific" need for killing whales, someone else responded by asking why against whale killing and not against other "pleasures". Yesterday I read in my Dutch newspaper (NRC/Handelsblad) that an initiative has led to the collection of 2,500,000 signatures from 63 countries agaist Spanish bullfights, and that these have been offered to some Spanish representative. Unfortunately, I have missed this initiative, else it would be 2,500,001. All the best, Hans PS, if this doesn't work, could we brainstorm about the scientific need for killing matadors? One a day would be perfect.
Re: Whale killing - other animals
Author: Hartmut Frommert
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:35
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:35
32 lines
2335 bytes
2335 bytes
In article <1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> dubuf@sicsun.epfl.ch (Hans DU BUF) writes: >Last week or so when someone started the discussion about the Norwegian >"scientific" need for killing whales, [..] This was me. >Yesterday I read in my Dutch newspaper (NRC/Handelsblad) that an >initiative has led to the collection of 2,500,000 signatures from 63 >countries agaist Spanish bullfights, and that these have been offered to >some Spanish representative. >Unfortunately, I have missed this initiative, else it would be 2,500,001. Very noble from you to be against bullfights, I'm also against. But -- pleeease, don't confuse bulls with whales. It is not helpful for either if you put in the same discussion. I'm against bullfights because this is killing for (some unnatural) pleasure, and I'm against whale killing since at least some of the whale species (dolphins and orcas) are intelligent AND nobody really needs to kill/eat whales: Norwegians, Japanese, Icelanders, and Faroeer Islanders have enough fish, beef, pork, lamb, chicken, etc. Another interesting point MIGHT well be that some whalers perhaps think of themselves as quasi-matadors or some kind of "heroic sportsmen". Since whales don't even try to defend themselves (contrary to bulls), this is totally misleading -- whale killing is also coward and dangerous only for stupid whalers. -- Hartmut Frommert, Physics, Univ of Constance, | + Whale killing is murder. + P.O.Box 55 60, D-W-7750 Konstanz, Germany | + Eat whale killers. + E-Mail: <phfrom@dknkurz1.bitnet> or <phfrom@nyx.uni-konstanz.de> + "Windows NoT" expands in German to "Windows Noch Teurer" + ^even ^more expensive
Re: Whale killing - other animals
Author: Ken Arromdee
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:44
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:44
12 lines
1064 bytes
1064 bytes
In article <1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> dubuf@sicsun.epfl.ch (Hans DU BUF) writes:
>Yesterday I read in my Dutch newspaper (NRC/Handelsblad) that an
>initiative has led to the collection of 2,500,000 signatures from 63
>countries agaist Spanish bullfights, and that these have been offered to
>some Spanish representative.
Isn't this attempting to impose your culture on someone else?
--
Hi! Ani mutacia shel virus .signature. Ha`atek oti letoch .signature shelcha!
Ken Arromdee (UUCP: ....!jhunix!arromdee; BITNET: arromdee@jhuvm;
INTERNET: arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu)
Re: Whale killing - other animals
Author: Hans DU BUF
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 09:36
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 09:36
36 lines
2669 bytes
2669 bytes
In article <1992Jul28.184456.2733@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>, arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes: |> In article <1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> dubuf@sicsun.epfl.ch (Hans DU BUF) writes: |> >Yesterday I read in my Dutch newspaper (NRC/Handelsblad) that an |> >initiative has led to the collection of 2,500,000 signatures from 63 |> >countries agaist Spanish bullfights, and that these have been offered to |> >some Spanish representative. |> |> Isn't this attempting to impose your culture on someone else? |> -- Yep, so what (apart from the fact that many Spanish people don't like it themselves). Like "intellectuals" (I hate this word) should take their responsability in TRYING to suppress stupid habits in their own country, there exists the same responsability between countries. Of course, I am sometimes too optimistic, look only what happens in Turkey, the most disgusting country in the NATO, to people instead of to just animals. What a shame, and that's only one example. Also, responding to the reply from Frommert who started this discussion and who wants to keep a special status for whales because of their intelligence in contrast to bulls: I think that mankind, after I don't know how many millennia of intellectual evolution (don't laugh, I know it is ridiculous), has to decide to respect nature and to keep their hands off all animals including their biotopes. The question is then where to put the limit if any: for example, horses may be more intelligent than cows and are not consumed in many countries, but there are at least no horse- fights as far as I know and the killing is hidden away in slaughterhouses. I don't want to continue this discussion because of the many political and cultural aspects involved, not to speak off ethical aspects. Apart from intelligence, which I don't accept as the only valid argument, there are no reasons to kill whales. All products have substitutes now, and they can eat as much krill as they want, whatever the consequences for our fishing industry. And if the Norwegian government is fooled by the industrial lobby, we have also to attack that industry: boycott!
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads