🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <530@brueer.ee.brunel.ac.uk> linda@ee.brunel.ac.uk (Linda Birmingham) writes:
>Why not PHILOSOPHICAL discussions on the technology of science and 
>mathematics.

Because there already exists talk.philosophy.misc.

>Its alright for those of you that receive the other philosophy related
>newsgroups but WE DONT. I'm really glad that discussions have broken out in
>a newsgroup that we get. Being new to philosophy I've never heard of Ayn
>Rand and will be interested in discussions of her ideas. The problem
>will be in finding the time to read them.

I like Rand.  I read Rand.  If you are interested in Rand, you should read
*The Virtue of Selfishness*.  I am going to be very selfish here.  I don't
care about your problem of not getting the other philosophy related 
newsgroups.  My problem is wading through all the philosophy related
newsgroups.  Those people who decided that they were interested in the
history and philosophy of science and technology went and created this
newsgroup to fix *their* problem.  Now you need to fix yours, but if
you dump a lot of other philosophy into this newsgroup, I am going
to create sci.history.sci.and.technology -- (damn it!  I still think
that this newsgroup is misnamed) and then I am going to rm group this
newsgroup in a fit of pique.

What you need is to have talk.philosophy.* gatewayed to your machine. I
don't know the political problems that you face in getting this.  Perhaps
it would be easier to have a Europe-Only discussion group for philosophy.
In any case, it is your problem -- go to it.  Our problem is to keep
inappropriate discussions from cropping up here.

Yours sincerely,
Laura Creighton
sci.philosophy.tech thought police

-- 
(C) Copyright 1987 Laura Creighton - you may redistribute only if your 
    recipients may.

	``One must pay dearly for immortality:  one has to die several
	times while alive.'' -- Nietzsche

Laura Creighton	
ihnp4!hoptoad!laura  utzoo!hoptoad!laura  sun!hoptoad!laura