🚀 go-pugleaf

Technology will kill us all ! ! !!
By: Brian Raab on Sun, 03 Oct 2004 03:53

Wrestling is pure philosophy ! ! !
By: Karl-Hugo Weesberg on Sat, 23 Oct 2004 07:48

Re: Technology will kill us all ! ! !!
By: detectivedelspooner on Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:35

Re: Technology will kill us all ! ! !!
By: Rguy84 on Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:46

Re: Technology will kill us all ! ! !!
By: Rguy84 on Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:45

Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Hans-Marc Olsen on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:20

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Don on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:19

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Rguy84 on Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:38

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Rguy84 on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:21

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Simon Hosie on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:59

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Simon Hosie on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:02

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Rguy84 on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:31

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: Rguy84 on Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:16

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: detectivedelspooner on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:28

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: detectivedelspooner on Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:20

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: detectivedelspooner on Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:29

Re: Technology is a SIN ! ! ! ! ! !
By: detectivedelspooner on Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:27

Technology is for lamers and communists only !
By: G.K. Konnig on Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:53

Re: Technology is for lamers and communists only !
By: ZZBunker on Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:44

Re: Technology is for lamers and communists only !
By: maryam on Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:50

Re: Technology is for lamers and communists only !
By: Rguy84 on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:33

I think scientists have the right to dominate the world !!!
By: Eliot Coweye on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:17

Call for Papers--Bertrand Russell
By: John R Lenz on Tue, 20 Oct 1992 02:00

Re: Toward a Science of Consciousness 1998
By: cijadra on Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00

Re: Toward a Science of Consciousness 1998
By: Hermital on Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00

Re: Toward a Science of Consciousness 1998
By: Hermital on Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00

Re: Toward a Science of Consciousness 1998
By: cijadra on Sun, 19 Apr 1998 00:00

Re: "New" colours possible?
By: Beverly Erlebacher on Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:14

ARP WWW Site, (with Information about Graduate Study in Australia).
By: Greg Restall on Wed, 29 Mar 1995 05:37

e-mail address of Cantini
By: Holger Trebbe on Fri, 08 Dec 1995 00:00

Call for papers: Computational Learning Theory
By: Mark Fulk on Mon, 26 Feb 1990 14:44

Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
By: T. William Wells on Sun, 14 Jan 1990 12:57

Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
By: Dinah B. Schein on Sun, 14 Jan 1990 07:40

CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.philosophy.objectivism
By: T. William Wells on Sat, 13 Jan 1990 14:02

Reasons why you don't prove your programs are correct
By: "Steve" Stevenson on Mon, 08 Jan 1990 14:31

Is math certain? (Was: Rhetoric and Software Engineering)
By: J A Biep Durieux on Wed, 31 May 1989 08:54

Models of the Mind (Was: Re: request for philosophic...)
By: Norman R. Gall on Sun, 07 May 1989 18:25

Re: request for philosophic reactions to connectionism
By: Norman R. Gall on Wed, 03 May 1989 03:49

Re: How to debate the creationists.
By: Jim Meritt on Mon, 12 Dec 1988 15:58

Simulations of evolution
By: daniel m offutt on Sat, 17 Dec 1988 03:56

Re: How to debate the creationists.
By: Daniel Gene Sinclair on Tue, 13 Dec 1988 22:52

Re: How to debate the creationists.
By: Brain in Neutral on Tue, 13 Dec 1988 20:46

Re: How to debate the creationists.
By: Stephen Smoliar on Mon, 12 Dec 1988 23:00

Re: How to debate the creationists.
By: daniel m offutt on Sat, 10 Dec 1988 02:33

How to debate the creationists.
By: Gregory Nowak on Fri, 09 Dec 1988 22:28

Determinism vs. Indeterminism, the answer
By: Dave Peru on Wed, 05 Oct 1988 00:26

Re: Who else isn't a science?
By: bill coderre on Tue, 05 Jul 1988 18:09

The Liar
By: Jon Barwise on Sat, 09 Apr 1988 21:10

Re: Suggested Reading: Analytic/Synthetic Dichotomy
By: Russell Turpin on Thu, 07 Apr 1988 15:45

Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.
By: Barry W. Kort on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 12:35

Suggested Reading: Analytic/Synthetic Dichotomy
By: Brian W. Hart on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 01:55

Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.
By: Richard Harter on Wed, 06 Apr 1988 05:10

Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.
By: Barry W. Kort on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 17:56

Re: The Liar
By: Richard Harter on Tue, 05 Apr 1988 18:43

Re: The Liar
By: Richard Harter on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 18:07

Re: The Liar
By: Richard Harter on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 16:52

Re: The Liar
By: Richard Harter on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 16:40

Re: Mercury's day and other mysteries
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 10:53

Re: The Liar
By: Adam Alexander Margulies on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 05:29

Re: The Liar
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 07:29

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Reid M. Pinchback on Mon, 04 Apr 1988 22:06

The Liar
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Fri, 01 Apr 1988 15:21

Re: The Liar
By: Richard Harter on Sun, 03 Apr 1988 05:58

Re: The Liar
By: Stephen Bloch on Sun, 03 Apr 1988 06:27

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Richard Newsome on Wed, 30 Mar 1988 05:06

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Stacey Greenstein on Tue, 22 Mar 1988 06:10

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Jeffrey Mincy on Tue, 22 Mar 1988 00:36

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Stacey Greenstein on Sun, 20 Mar 1988 20:27

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Cliff Joslyn on Sun, 20 Mar 1988 17:35

Re: Ed Fredkin
By: Stacey Greenstein on Sun, 20 Mar 1988 09:18

Ed Fredkin
By: Patricia O Tuama on Sun, 20 Mar 1988 05:15

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Geo. R. Greene, Jr. on Fri, 18 Mar 1988 22:44

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Torkel Franzen on Fri, 04 Mar 1988 01:14

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Gregory Nowak on Wed, 02 Mar 1988 23:22

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Mark William Hopkins on Wed, 02 Mar 1988 03:16

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: J. Serembus on Mon, 29 Feb 1988 15:20

Re: Meyer's recantation from relevance
By: William J. Rapaport on Mon, 29 Feb 1988 23:14

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Bob Riemenschneider on Mon, 29 Feb 1988 20:23

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: J. Serembus on Thu, 25 Feb 1988 17:16

Re: Meyer's recantation from relevance
By: Bradley Enoch Huntting on Fri, 26 Feb 1988 17:23

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: hbe on Thu, 25 Feb 1988 22:23

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Mark William Hopkins on Thu, 25 Feb 1988 23:56

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: greg Nowak on Thu, 25 Feb 1988 20:15

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Bob Riemenschneider on Thu, 25 Feb 1988 16:55

Meyer's recantation from relevance
By: Jack Campin on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 18:12

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: hbe on Wed, 24 Feb 1988 20:43

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Richard Harter on Wed, 24 Feb 1988 03:25

Decision Makingorkshop
By: haddawy on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 16:00

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: greg Nowak on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 23:48

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Barry W. Kort on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 18:59

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: William J. Rapaport on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 15:41

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: greg Nowak on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 02:14

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Richard Harter on Tue, 23 Feb 1988 01:29

Re: Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Mon, 22 Feb 1988 22:48

Classifying the Axiom of Choice
By: Barry W. Kort on Mon, 22 Feb 1988 18:38

Re: Another flame from greg
By: greg Nowak on Sat, 20 Feb 1988 04:03

Re: Another flame from greg
By: IU6 on Thu, 18 Feb 1988 00:34

Re: Another flame from greg
By: Gordon Fitch on Wed, 17 Feb 1988 17:35

Re: Another flame from greg
By: Mark William Hopkins on Sun, 14 Feb 1988 01:32

Another flame from greg
By: greg Nowak on Sat, 13 Feb 1988 01:46

Re: Existential & Mathematical Eclecticism
By: Barry W. Kort on Fri, 12 Feb 1988 22:05

Re: Existential & Mathematical Eclecticism
By: lae on Thu, 11 Feb 1988 17:43

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Paul V Torek on Sat, 30 Jan 1988 04:46

Re: Foxes and Hedgehogs
By: janw on Mon, 18 Jan 1988 15:55

Flame Over, Flame Out
By: Geo. R. Greene, Jr. on Mon, 18 Jan 1988 19:35

Re: prickles and goo
By: Christian Ronse on Thu, 21 Jan 1988 09:28

Re: prickles and goo
By: Robert Firth on Mon, 11 Jan 1988 17:25

prickles and goo
By: Joe Buck on Mon, 11 Jan 1988 07:28

Re: prickles and goo
By: Robin Faichney on Tue, 12 Jan 1988 17:41

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Frank Adams on Sat, 09 Jan 1988 02:51

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Frank Adams on Sat, 09 Jan 1988 02:20

Re: prickles and goo
By: John Romkey on Mon, 11 Jan 1988 18:44

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Tue, 05 Jan 1988 13:40

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Paul V Torek on Tue, 05 Jan 1988 01:35

Re: Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Obnoxious Math Grad Student on Thu, 31 Dec 1987 08:40

Infinite Regress -- what's wrong with it
By: Paul V Torek on Wed, 30 Dec 1987 15:34

Methodology
By: J. A. "Biep" Durieux on Tue, 15 Dec 1987 15:59

Re: I am still alive - Biep.
By: Robin Faichney on Wed, 28 Oct 1987 16:16

I am still alive - Biep.
By: J. A. "Biep" Durieux on Fri, 16 Oct 1987 11:14

Re: Godel (short)
By: T. Moody on Sun, 11 Oct 1987 20:48

Re: Godel (short)
By: Frank Adams on Fri, 09 Oct 1987 22:51

Re: Godel (short)
By: Stephen Bloch on Fri, 09 Oct 1987 05:46

incompleteness of formal systems
By: Dr. B. Litow on Thu, 08 Oct 1987 14:18

Re: Godel (short)
By: Radford Neal on Mon, 05 Oct 1987 22:31

Re: Layman's argument for Occam's razor
By: Frank Adams on Tue, 06 Oct 1987 01:03

Parts II and III of G"odel in sci.math
By: Christian Ronse on Tue, 06 Oct 1987 09:29

Re: Godel (short)
By: Michael P. Smith on Mon, 05 Oct 1987 06:47

Godel (short)
By: The Reverend w. No Name on Mon, 05 Oct 1987 02:20