Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech

Article #1404

Back to sci.philosophy.tech Previous Next

#1404

From: Barry W. Kort
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 1988 17:56

8 lines
775 bytes

Concerning Richard Harter's reducible/irreducible sentences,
don't we fall into the vortex with stuff like:

	1. The following sentence is reducible.
	2. The preceding sentence is irreducible.

--Barry Kort

Technical Details

Message-ID: <28426@linus.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!rayssd!raybed2!linus!mbunix!bwk

References: <8224@agate.BERKELEY> <26505@cca> <8307@agate.BERKELEY> <26593@cca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!rayssd!raybed2!linus!mbunix!bwk
From: bwk@mitre-bedford.ARPA (Barry W. Kort)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.
Message-ID: <28426@linus.UUCP>
Date: 5 Apr 88 17:56:12 GMT
References: <8224@agate.BERKELEY> <26505@cca> <8307@agate.BERKELEY> <26593@cca>
Sender: news@linus.UUCP
Reply-To: bwk@mbunix (Kort)
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Mass.
Lines: 8
Keywords: Buy the Book.
Summary: I suspect there is no way out of the loop except to jump.

Reply to Parent Message