Re: Science and Aesthetics

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech

Article #1243

Back to sci.philosophy.tech Previous Next

#1243

From: Russell Turpin
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1987 15:31

17 lines
1001 bytes

In article <2715@hoptoad.uucp>, laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton) writes:
> > But it is a philosophic, as opposed to aesthetic, principle.
> 
> How do you define philosophic?  In my neck of the woods, aesthetics is
> philosophy.  Do you mean epistemologic?
> 
> Laura Creighton	

Mea culpa. Thanks for correcting me.

Russell

feeder
.
.
.
feeder

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8738@ut-sally.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!turpin

References: <120@snark.UUCP> <86@thirdi.UUCP> <8707@ut-sally.UUCP> <2715@hoptoad.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!turpin
From: turpin@ut-sally.UUCP (Russell Turpin)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Science and Aesthetics
Message-ID: <8738@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Aug-87 11:31:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.8738
Posted: Fri Aug 14 11:31:44 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Aug-87 00:37:06 EDT
References: <120@snark.UUCP> <86@thirdi.UUCP> <8707@ut-sally.UUCP> <2715@hoptoad.uucp>
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 17
Keywords: elegance beauty truth
Summary: You're right, I should have said epistemologic.

Reply to Parent Message