🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <20194@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, kube@cogsci.berkeley.edu (Paul Kube) writes:
>                                             Ockham's razor enjoins us to
> disbelieve the first [simpler] theory, other things being equal; and I'm
> still wondering if there's an argument for it.
> 
> --Paul kube@berkeley.edu, ...!ucbvax!kube

There is no *formal* argument for Occam's Razor. It's a heuristic, based on
experience of what kinds of theory-building practices yield the most predictive
and robust theories. The argument for it, like the argument for scientific
method itself, is simply that it works.
-- 
      Eric S. Raymond
      UUCP:  {{seismo,ihnp4,rutgers}!cbmvax,sdcrdcf!burdvax,vu-vlsi}!snark!eric
      Post:  22 South Warren Avenue, Malvern, PA 19355    Phone: (215)-296-5718