Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #309Re: Dualism
From: Evan Hunt
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:25
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:25
20 lines
1411 bytes
1411 bytes
Don't blame me, I voted for chalmers@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers). >Give me an idea of how the facts about consciousness are entailed >by the physical facts about a system. Your attempt above consists >in pointing that such a system will act as if it's conscious -- but >acting as if one is conscious is clearly logically compatible with >the absence of consciousness. One cannot measure consciousness in a system (or in a person) save by evaluation of the system's (or person's) behavior. Your replica seems just as conscious as you; can you suggest any further test I might subject it to that would prove it nonsentient? It can indeed be logically argued that "being conscious" and "acting conscious" are separate, but unless "being conscious" is independently measureable, the assertion can never be proven. -- "This coffee is my blood, this breakfast burrito is my flesh. And it cost me 89 cents, so get your goddamned own." - Jeff Lester, "Saint 11"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep12.232531.3921@sco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!scorn!evanhReferences:
<BuDoJ5.MDM@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep11.194758.7442@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> <BuG0pw.Cru@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!scorn!evanh From: evanh@sco.COM (Evan Hunt) Subject: Re: Dualism Organization: Stan's Chosen Ones Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:25:31 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep12.232531.3921@sco.com> References: <BuDoJ5.MDM@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep11.194758.7442@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> <BuG0pw.Cru@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Sender: news@sco.com (News admin) Lines: 20