🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #309

Re: Dualism

#309
From: Evan Hunt
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:25
20 lines
1411 bytes
Don't blame me, I voted for chalmers@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers).
>Give me an idea of how the facts about consciousness are entailed
>by the physical facts about a system.  Your attempt above consists
>in pointing that such a system will act as if it's conscious -- but
>acting as if one is conscious is clearly logically compatible with
>the absence of consciousness.

One cannot measure consciousness in a system (or in a person) save by
evaluation of the system's (or person's) behavior.  Your replica seems
just as conscious as you; can you suggest any further test I might
subject it to that would prove it nonsentient?

It can indeed be logically argued that "being conscious" and "acting
conscious" are separate, but unless "being conscious" is independently
measureable, the assertion can never be proven.

-- 
"This coffee is my blood, this breakfast burrito is my flesh.  And
 it cost me 89 cents, so get your goddamned own." - Jeff Lester, "Saint 11"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep12.232531.3921@sco.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!scorn!evanh
References: <BuDoJ5.MDM@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep11.194758.7442@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> <BuG0pw.Cru@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!scorn!evanh
From: evanh@sco.COM (Evan Hunt)
Subject: Re: Dualism
Organization: Stan's Chosen Ones
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:25:31 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Sep12.232531.3921@sco.com>
References: <BuDoJ5.MDM@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep11.194758.7442@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> <BuG0pw.Cru@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@sco.com (News admin)
Lines: 20