Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #312Re: Science vs Philosophy of
From: Barry Merriman
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 04:23
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 04:23
27 lines
1391 bytes
1391 bytes
In article <1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu> tycchow@riesz.mit.edu (Timothy Y. Chow) writes: > How do you divorce the > concept of "Being-in-the-world" from Heidegger, or "Absolute Spirit" from > Hegel? Such divorcing is not as easy as you seem to make it out to be. > We quite succesfully divorced calculus from Newton and Electrodynamics from Maxwell. If the notions you cite cannot be divorced from their authors, that says to me that the phrases don't really mean anything, and that philosophers are more interested in the individuals than in the ideas. > Secondly, if the originals are inferior, where can we find these superior > presentations that you seem to imply exist? I'm suggesting that the fact they cannot be found points to a weakness in philosophy and/or philosophical discourse. -- Barry Merriman UCLA Dept. of Math UCLA Inst. for Fusion and Plasma Research barry@math.ucla.edu (Internet; NeXTMail is welcome)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug30.042348.19289@math.ucla.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-ma!newsReferences:
<1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-ma!news From: barry@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman) Subject: Re: Science vs Philosophy of Message-ID: <1992Aug30.042348.19289@math.ucla.edu> Sender: news@math.ucla.edu Organization: UCLA, Mathematics Department References: <1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 04:23:48 GMT Lines: 29