🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #312

Re: Science vs Philosophy of

#312
From: Barry Merriman
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 04:23
27 lines
1391 bytes
In article <1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu> tycchow@riesz.mit.edu  
(Timothy Y. Chow) writes:

>  How do you divorce the
> concept of "Being-in-the-world" from Heidegger, or "Absolute Spirit" from
> Hegel?  Such divorcing is not as easy as you seem to make it out to be.
> 

We quite succesfully divorced calculus from Newton and 
Electrodynamics from Maxwell. If the notions you cite cannot be divorced
from their authors, that says to me that the phrases don't really
mean anything, and that philosophers are more interested in
the individuals than in the ideas.


> Secondly, if the originals are inferior, where can we find these superior
> presentations that you seem to imply exist?  

I'm suggesting that the fact they cannot be found points to a weakness
in philosophy and/or philosophical discourse.


--
Barry Merriman
UCLA Dept. of Math
UCLA Inst. for Fusion and Plasma Research
barry@math.ucla.edu (Internet; NeXTMail is welcome)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug30.042348.19289@math.ucla.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-ma!news
References: <1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!ucla-ma!news
From: barry@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman)
Subject: Re: Science vs Philosophy of
Message-ID: <1992Aug30.042348.19289@math.ucla.edu>
Sender: news@math.ucla.edu
Organization: UCLA, Mathematics Department
References: <1992Aug28.162115.22963@galois.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 04:23:48 GMT
Lines: 29