Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #327Re: nano-replicator assumptions
From: Dani Eder
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 15:43
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 15:43
72 lines
3642 bytes
3642 bytes
snodgras@crash.cts.com (John Snodgrass) writes: >In <1992Aug3.160058.11480@bnr.ca> bucknerb@bnr.ca (Brent Buckner) writes: > IMO, this doesn't cut it. In order for system A to copy system B, >system A would have to have complete knowledge of system B. But in order >for system B to copy system A, the same would have to be true; but consider >the fact that system A contains complete knowledge of system B. Hence system >B's picture of system A contains an inset which is system A's picture of >system B, which in turn must contain an inset which is system B's picture of >system A, ad infinitum. Consider a system consisting of universal robotic modules. Each module contains a motor-driven joint, solar cells for power, a solid state CCD for imaging, latches for attaching to other modules, and a processor and memory for brains. All modules are identical, but they can be attached in various combinations. Several joints in series can form an arm or leg. An array of modules with solar cells aligned can form a solar array for power, with a couple of the joints on the sides providing tracking, etc. The modules may contain some dozens to a hundred discrete parts, which are repeated in each module. The memory of a large number of modules can split up the task of memorizing the steps to manufacturing each of the parts of a module. A sufficiently large set of units can remember all of the steps to making a module, which then needs to be repeated enough times to make a second set which can then copy the full set of instructions. > I would certainly be interested to see a detailed design of a system >that could physically copy itself. It seems to me I heard of Godel making >some such suggestion -- but I could be wrong. Anyway, as I said previously, >the usual argument is that it is _possible_ (based on the fact that living >systems already do it) but very complicated. My suggestion is that one may >have to replace 'very' with 'infinitely'. In the universal robot modules concept above, we have a single product to make: a robot module. This requires: Metal for structure Battery Solar cell memory processor CCD Wires motor for joint latch solenoids latch hardware Assume that the robots are initially out in an un-developed area with mixed fields and forest. They will have to recapitulate the evolution of technology - starting with grasping stones and using them as shovels and axes to build simple structures - such as a smelting furnace to make iron - from which tools can be made. If the modules have a flat shiny side, they can concentrate sunlight to make a solar furnace, and reduce ores in that. There are many steps to get to all the parts listed above, but it is a finite number, so a large enough set of robots would have enough memory capacity to memorize them all. Dani Eder -- Dani Eder/Boeing/Advanced Civil Space/(205)464-2697(w)/232-7467(h)/ Rt.1, Box 188-2, Athens AL 35611/Member: Space Studies Institute Physical Location: 34deg 37' N 86deg 43' W +100m alt. ***THE ABOVE IS NOT THE OPINION OF THE BOEING COMPANY OR ITS MANAGEMENT.***
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1528@hsvaic.boeing.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!bcstec!bcsaic!hsvaic!ederReferences:
<snodgras.712736948@crash> <1992Aug3.160058.11480@bnr.ca> <snodgras.713303887@crash>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!bcstec!bcsaic!hsvaic!eder From: eder@hsvaic.boeing.com (Dani Eder) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: nano-replicator assumptions Keywords: nanotechnology, replicator, assembler Message-ID: <1528@hsvaic.boeing.com> Date: 11 Aug 92 15:43:15 GMT References: <snodgras.712736948@crash> <1992Aug3.160058.11480@bnr.ca> <snodgras.713303887@crash> Distribution: na Organization: Boeing AI Center, Huntsville, AL Lines: 72