Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #371Re: Proof of God's Existence
From: Torkel Franzen
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 15:39
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 15:39
15 lines
1342 bytes
1342 bytes
In article <Bu22I4.AyF@unx.sas.com> sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill) writes: >|> This would make as much sense as sending scientific papers to >|> real philosophers to referee. >Come on guys, I know for a fact of two areas in which this *does* >happen. I didn't say that it makes no sense. It's a good idea in some cases. My point is just that it makes as much sense to let real philosophers check the philosophy of scientists as it does to let real scientists check the science of philosophers. Of course, in most cases, scientists have no particular competence to pronounce on the contents of philosophical papers, and conversely.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TORKEL.92Sep4163946@bast.sics.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!ericom!sunic!sics.se!torkelReferences:
<Bu13pL.C83@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep4.040504.3673@math.ucla.edu> <TORKEL.92Sep4100904@isis.sics.se> <Bu22I4.AyF@unx.sas.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!ericom!sunic!sics.se!torkel From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: Proof of God's Existence Message-ID: <TORKEL.92Sep4163946@bast.sics.se> Date: 4 Sep 92 15:39:46 GMT References: <Bu13pL.C83@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep4.040504.3673@math.ucla.edu> <TORKEL.92Sep4100904@isis.sics.se> <Bu22I4.AyF@unx.sas.com> Sender: news@sics.se Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista Lines: 15 In-Reply-To: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com's message of Fri, 4 Sep 1992 13:22:52 GMT