🚀 go-pugleaf

S. Torkel in response to my "God and Zorn's Exisitence"
criticizes my suggestion of the absence of a-priori non-trivial truths
about the world.
His criticism revolves around what non-trivial & a-priori mean.
Well, that's fine. Nonetheless, a counterexample is required.

So, just come up with anything that you think an intelligent person
would perhaps classify as an a-priori, non-trivial truth.
There's no point arguing about the various shades of grey unless you
can possibly do this.
Yours,
Kevin DAvey