Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #399Re: Dualism
From: Randall Holmes
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:22
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:22
49 lines
2751 bytes
2751 bytes
In article <_cwnz1m.kmc@netcom.com> kmc@netcom.com (Kevin McCarty) writes: >In article <1992Sep11.224807.13323@math.ucla.edu> barry@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman) writes: >>Dualism is simply another form of mysticism. Its the same old >>premise: we don't understand something, therefore there must >>be a paranormal phenomena at work. > >What mysticism? I don't know what you're railing at. There's >absolutely nothing paranormal going on at all. The two >incontrovertible facts at issue here are as plain and mundane as the >nose on your face: there are physical phenomena such as objects, and >there are mental phenomena such as sensations. And a mystery: how are >they so different? How do you know that they are different? They are spoken of in totally different ways -- how does one compare them? I don't see any obstruction at all to identifying conscious experiences with events in my brain; the causal behaviour is right. We are dealing with objects with incommensurable descriptions here -- we have no reason to believe that the _objects_ are different, just that the _descriptions_ are different. > >>I take the historical perspective: this argument has failed in >>so many contexts, as science one by one develops the understanding, >>that we should expect this sort of argument to fail again. >> >>The 'soul' has hopped from organ to organ, as each organs >>function has been elucidated. It used to reside in the heart, >>and at another point, the kidney, and its come to its final resting >>place in the brain. The brain is harder to unravel than than the heart or >>kidney, but folks are making steady progress, and I'm sure we'll >>live to see it exorcised from the brain as well. > >Who said anything about a soul? What's that got to do with anything? >Do you really think that such things as affect, blueness, and the >sonority of a major triad will be exorcised someday? Why would anyone >want to do that? > > >-- >Kevin McCarty (kmc@netcom.com) -- The opinions expressed | --Sincerely, above are not the "official" | M. Randall Holmes opinions of any person | Math. Dept., Boise State Univ. or institution. | holmes@opal.idbsu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep15.212220.20059@guinness.idbsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.byu.edu!ux1!mica.inel.gov!guinness!opal.idbsu.edu!holmesReferences:
<1992Sep11.224807.13323@math.ucla.edu> <_cwnz1m.kmc@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.byu.edu!ux1!mica.inel.gov!guinness!opal.idbsu.edu!holmes From: holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) Subject: Re: Dualism Message-ID: <1992Sep15.212220.20059@guinness.idbsu.edu> Sender: usenet@guinness.idbsu.edu (Usenet News mail) Nntp-Posting-Host: opal Organization: Boise State University Math Dept. References: <1992Sep11.224807.13323@math.ucla.edu> <_cwnz1m.kmc@netcom.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:22:20 GMT Lines: 49