Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #456Re: Dualism
From: Frank Adams
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:35
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:35
12 lines
1134 bytes
1134 bytes
In article <Bv9vGp.Ax3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> chalmers@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers) writes: >Precisely what needs to be explained is why that radiation "feels" >like anything at all -- i.e. why that all physical processing is >accompanied by an experiential feel -- so your parenthetical >explanation here won't do. There is also the secondary question >of why it feels like *that* rather than like *this* -- it seems >perfectly coherent that our blue experiences and red experiences >could be systematically inverted, for instance. Do you think how it feels has no behavioral consequences? Would you behave as you do if your blue experiences and your pain experiences were systematically inverted?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep28.203519.133337@Cookie.secapl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!secapl!Cookie!frankReferences:
<Bv9AIx.HBz@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep28.005156.11177@sophia.smith.edu> <Bv9vGp.Ax3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!secapl!Cookie!frank From: frank@Cookie.secapl.com (Frank Adams) Subject: Re: Dualism Message-ID: <1992Sep28.203519.133337@Cookie.secapl.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:35:19 GMT References: <Bv9AIx.HBz@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep28.005156.11177@sophia.smith.edu> <Bv9vGp.Ax3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Organization: Security APL, Inc. Lines: 12