🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #565

Re: Dualism

#565
From: Jeff Dalton
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:49
16 lines
1260 bytes
In article <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu> holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes:

>If you have explained why an intelligent
>being will assert that it is conscious, it is very hard to imagine
>that you have not explained consciousness itself. 

I don't see how this can be so unless a lot turns on "intelligent",
because it must be possible to build a simple robot, or to program a
computer, to say "I'm consciousness" from time to time and to
answer "yes" to a range of questions about whether it was conscious.

So it shouldn't be hard to explain why some entities assert that
they are conscious, and even if we could explain why all intelligent
entities would assert they were conscious (which I suspect is what
you had in mind), I don't see why that would have to explain
consciousness as well. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7710@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
References: <Buqq86.7oJ.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BuypEM.KH2@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Dualism
Message-ID: <7710@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:49:16 GMT
References: <Buqq86.7oJ.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BuypEM.KH2@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu>
Sender: news@aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 16