Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #565Re: Dualism
From: Jeff Dalton
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:49
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:49
16 lines
1260 bytes
1260 bytes
In article <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu> holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes: >If you have explained why an intelligent >being will assert that it is conscious, it is very hard to imagine >that you have not explained consciousness itself. I don't see how this can be so unless a lot turns on "intelligent", because it must be possible to build a simple robot, or to program a computer, to say "I'm consciousness" from time to time and to answer "yes" to a range of questions about whether it was conscious. So it shouldn't be hard to explain why some entities assert that they are conscious, and even if we could explain why all intelligent entities would assert they were conscious (which I suspect is what you had in mind), I don't see why that would have to explain consciousness as well.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7710@skye.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeffReferences:
<Buqq86.7oJ.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BuypEM.KH2@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: Dualism Message-ID: <7710@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 14 Oct 92 17:49:16 GMT References: <Buqq86.7oJ.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BuypEM.KH2@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep22.181940.1611@guinness.idbsu.edu> Sender: news@aiai.ed.ac.uk Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 16