Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #670Re: FREE WILL 1: Compatibilism sucks!
From: Daryl McCullough
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:55
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:55
23 lines
1312 bytes
1312 bytes
rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) writes:
>> [Definition of determinism:]
>> `The theory that the state of a system at some time and the rela-
>> tions governing the time development of the system determine, un-
>> ambiguously, the state of the system at any later time.
>This definition presupposes that "the state of a system at some time"
>has meaning. According to relativity, the notion of simultaneity is
>dependent upon the observer.
I don't think that relativity is at all incompatible with determinism.
Of course, there are an infinite number of ways to assign times to
space-time events, but you can always state determinism as follows:
The universe is deterministic if for *every* time assignment to
space-time points, and for every time t (according to that
assignment), the state of the universe at time t uniquely determines
the state at times t'>t.
Daryl McCullough
ORA Corp.
Ithaca, NY
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov10.135511.1021@oracorp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!psinntp!psinntp!scylla!darylShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,talk.philosophy.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!psinntp!psinntp!scylla!daryl From: daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough) Subject: Re: FREE WILL 1: Compatibilism sucks! Message-ID: <1992Nov10.135511.1021@oracorp.com> Organization: ORA Corporation Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:55:11 GMT Lines: 23