Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #806Re: Philosophy before science ? (was : S
From: Hakki Kocabas
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 23:47
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 23:47
26 lines
1303 bytes
1303 bytes
> |> However my son ! Facts are never presecribed by theory, facts are the > |> results of observation. What facts ? What observations ? An observation is conducted according to a theory, in the first place... > I don't have much of a clue what "prescribed" means here. Perhaps > what is meant is that the range of "possible facts" or the range > of "descriptions of facts" is limited by theory. That wouldn't be > *so* bad a claim. > > |> For example, electrons were there much before quantum mechanics 'electrons were there' ?! according to what theory ? [rest is deleted] > A great deal of > *theory* needs to come into play in order to describe how an electron > is observed (if indeed we want to say that this is possible) or > what "observed" *means* when applied to electrons. exactly.. > Gary H. Merrill [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<102936.85652.20991@kcbbs.gen.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!kcbbs!kcShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!kcbbs!kc Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: Philosophy before science ? (was : S Message-ID: <102936.85652.20991@kcbbs.gen.nz> From: Hakki_Kocabas@kcbbs.gen.nz (Hakki Kocabas) Date: 7 Jan 93 23:47:32 GMT Organization: Kappa Crucis Unix BBS, Auckland, New Zealand Lines: 26